• suokoOP
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      It might sounds odd but they should invest into renewables even more now. Imo Fukushima disaster has been probably underestimated by global news, just think of the huge quanrity of contaminated water that they’re releasing into the ocean right now, no more sushi! Seriously, something has not probably been disclosed to the public: how is it possible that A. Merkel, a physics always pro-nuclear energy, has changed her mind so fast?

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
        link
        21 year ago

        Except that’s not what’s actually happening. Meanwhile, Fukushima is in no way representative of modern nuclear reactors. Germany also doesn’t have tsunamis last I checked. Meanwhile, the amount of pollution released from fossil fuels Germany is using to replace nuclear eclipses even the damage Fukushima has done.

        Merkel is a politician, using what Merkel says as a guideline is pretty silly given that as you yourself admit she was originally pro nuclear energy which was a position based on actual facts.

        • suokoOP
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          We should see if she was interviewed about this topic and check if she doesn’t lie

  • @Zerush
    link
    11 year ago

    Not so simple, even if they turn off the nuclear power plants, they will have another 20-30 years left until they have dismantled and decontaminated these plants, this is going to cost them billions and also with thousands of tons of radioactive debris, which, like the rest waste so far no one knows where to put it safely for the next 30,000 generations.

    • suokoOP
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Like Italy (but we’re a special human species) where we are still paying billions to keep running (while dismantling them at the same time) our power plants which never produced a single kWh