I once read a Maoist article about the Soviet-Chinese conflicts. I remember the lack of analysis, the blaming of USSR for the beginning of the conflicts, as well as the whitewashing of the Chinese side. After that, I also read about the Afghan war from the same Maoists. And the same situation - the USSR is an aggressor, killed millions, established a stillborn regime, the Mujahideen were better in power. Also constant attempts to manipulate emotions.
my country’s resident maoist party (that ironically calls them marxist-leninist) openly supports terrorists like ISIS only bcs they go against the US, without counting that the US created them…
Maoists are just 21st century kautskysts and kautskysts are just the 20st century version of people marx argued against at his time
ISIS also do not go against US, they not only created them, they also steer them, if you look at history of their conflicts they somehow manage to attack all of the countries which USA is hostile to and avoid all the US allies. One would think anyone being in the nominally communist political party could do at least basic historical materialist analysis, but they apparently are on the level below even simple “qui bono” question.
Especially with how maoists usually know shit about Mao, hoxhaists just use Hoxha as a bludgeon against marxism-leninism also without knowing much and trots have million versions of idealised Trotsky thought (this one is kinda fitting though since Trotsky’s thoughts were also all over the place).
A Reddit link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on Teddit and Libreddit, which are Reddit frontends that protect your privacy.
NazBols don’t even pretend to be left most of the time. They’re mostly like “the most “great” leaders in history are who I will worship, the Tsars and Fascists had great power, but I can’t deny Commies did some good stuff and libs say they’re autocrats, so why not include them”
I fear this person is in to something.
This is the current president of Vietnam:
Notice something?
He’s wearing GLASSES! Vietnam is run by an URBANITE! SEMI-COLONY CONFIRMED!
“Cummunism is when no more city, power and everyone is farmer lol” - Carl Marx, 69 b.c
U know who other has glasses?
Dats right, KAUTSKY, that’s the proof that glasses are an urbanite bourgeois thing
I once read a Maoist article about the Soviet-Chinese conflicts. I remember the lack of analysis, the blaming of USSR for the beginning of the conflicts, as well as the whitewashing of the Chinese side. After that, I also read about the Afghan war from the same Maoists. And the same situation - the USSR is an aggressor, killed millions, established a stillborn regime, the Mujahideen were better in power. Also constant attempts to manipulate emotions.
Maosts are idealists
my country’s resident maoist party (that ironically calls them marxist-leninist) openly supports terrorists like ISIS only bcs they go against the US, without counting that the US created them…
Maoists are just 21st century kautskysts and kautskysts are just the 20st century version of people marx argued against at his time
ISIS also do not go against US, they not only created them, they also steer them, if you look at history of their conflicts they somehow manage to attack all of the countries which USA is hostile to and avoid all the US allies. One would think anyone being in the nominally communist political party could do at least basic historical materialist analysis, but they apparently are on the level below even simple “qui bono” question.
That’s not how semicolonial works fridge.
;
No, I meant “semi-COLONIAL”
woooosh
Imagine wasting all those letters when “CIA stooge” would have done.
Literally, at least make an NGO and get paid for it.
i made a twitter pro-russia account and now recieve 2500 Putinbucks each week
BTW the thread is this
Lol he sound just like Wisconcom, crazy wall of text rants boiling up to constantly screaming “revisionism” and “dengites” lol.
Especially with how maoists usually know shit about Mao, hoxhaists just use Hoxha as a bludgeon against marxism-leninism also without knowing much and trots have million versions of idealised Trotsky thought (this one is kinda fitting though since Trotsky’s thoughts were also all over the place).
well tbf enver hoxha was the only non-revisionist leader in europe
At least the person in the thread was kind enough to explain what they meant by revisionism. I don’t recall Wisconcom ever doing that.
A Reddit link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on Teddit and Libreddit, which are Reddit frontends that protect your privacy.
There are very few groups that make me wanna break left unity, Ultras and NazBols make me cringe even more than anarchists and SuccDems
NazBols don’t even pretend to be left most of the time. They’re mostly like “the most “great” leaders in history are who I will worship, the Tsars and Fascists had great power, but I can’t deny Commies did some good stuff and libs say they’re autocrats, so why not include them”
Is this from r/communism?
r/revisionism101
(socialism101)