removed by mod
11
removed by mod
@nurkurz
link
22M

Exclusivity demands by the buying party of a license should always be invalid in front of a court. It’s liertally the same as establishing a monoply on a certain good.

pete
creator
banned
link
1
edit-2
15d

removed by mod

@nurkurz
link
22M

I think that deal was less about exclusivity, and more about the enforced voluntary compliance of apple to well behaved networking. In theory one phone is able to jam a radio tower. Mobile networking is heavily dependent on devices not sending data outside of their time slot.

The iPhone was sold outside the US too. The AT&T deal probably had almost no impact on those markets.

  • 0 user online
  • 2 user / day
  • 2 user / week
  • 2 user / month
  • 4 user / 6 month
  • 23 subscriber
  • 7 Post
  • 5 Comment
  • Modlog