TLDR

  • Respect sovereignty of all countries

  • Oppose any unilateral sanctions not authorized by U.N. Security Council

  • A country’s security cannot be at expense of other countries security

  • We oppose development,use of biological and chemical weapons by any country under any circumstances

  • Regional security cannot be guaranteed by strengthening or even expanding military blocks

  • Nuclear weapons cannot be used and nuclear war cannot be fought

  • Cease fire and stop firing,prevent Ukraine crisis from further aggravating or even getting out of control

  • Maintain safety of nuclear power pans,oppose armed attacks on nuclear facilities

  • Gradually promote de-escalateion and easing of situation and finally reach comprehensive ceasefire

  • Dialogue,negotiations are only viable way to resolve Ukraine crisis

        • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
          link
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          US and Israel are way better examples, Israel have the most UN resolutions against it of all countries but nothing is ever being done because US blocks everything, and above you have voting about sanctions on Cuba which is so unjust even the most notorious US puppets are against it, yet again voting 185 to 2 and UN is completely powerless.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      11 year ago

      That’s how UN, an international institution set up by the US, works. If you think that countries have unilateral right to do whatever they like then don’t complain about what Russia is doing in Ukraine.

        • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
          link
          11 year ago

          Do you support Russia stopping selling gas to Europe, after EU has been clearly a side in the war?

            • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
              link
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              About the contracts, i don’t know how they are formulated, but something like both parties countries taking part in the same war on opposing sides is most likely a clause to nullify the contracts.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          01 year ago

          I think what you’re trying to say here is that you think that the global hegemon should be able to do siege warfare against its competitors. NATO invaded Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and many other countries. Yet, nobody has been able to refuse to do trade with them because this alliance was at the core of the global economy. So the system you’re evidently proposing here is that the big NATO alliance should be allowed to subjugate countries to its will, and everybody else should be punished by it when they don’t do what NATO wants. Am I getting this right?

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
              link
              11 year ago

              That’s literally what we see happening as the real world outcome of the system you’re advocating. So, yes that is in fact what you’re advocating whether you understand that or not.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  Nobody claimed that sanctions cause invasions. What’s being said is that sanctions are a form of modern siege warfare that the west practices. Sanctions have never succeeded in changing behavior of a country. What they do consistently accomplish is destroying the lives of the poorest people in the country. Sanctions are violence. They’re just a way to do violence on the cheap with public support from the public who don’t understand that sanctions are violence.

                  And it’s pretty amazing how you cannot think of any other option than violence. This is a quintessentially American perspective. The obvious other option is to do diplomacy and negotiation where parties understand each other’s positions and find a compromise middle ground. This is how problems are actually resolved. The reason the west never does this is because the west thinks it can simply dominate other countries and coerce them instead.

                  Your view on how to avoid invasions has demonstrably been shown to not work in practice.