Zackey Rahimi, the Texas criminal defendant challenging a federal gun law before the Supreme Court on Tuesday, said this summer that he no longer wanted to own firearms and expressed remorse for his actions that got him in trouble with the law.

“I will make sure for sure this time that when I finish my time being incarcerated to stay the faithful, righteous person I am this day, to stay away from all drugs at all times, do probation & parole rightfully, to go to school & have a great career, have a great manufacturing engineering job, to never break any law again, to stay away from the wrong circle, to stay away from all firearms & weapons, & to never be away from my family again,” Rahimi, who is being held at a Fort Worth jail, said in a handwritten letter dated July 25.

He continued: “I had firearms for the right reason in our place to be able to protect my family at all times especially for what we’ve went through in the past but I’ll make sure to do whatever it takes to be able to do everything the right pathway & to be able to come home fast as I can to take care of my family at all times.”

  • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s the justification, not the right. The right is to bear arms. The militia is everyone able-bodied in the US.

        • blazera@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That sounds like well regulated militia is the spirit of the law. The reason for it, the intention, however you want to word it.

          • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.

            Important parts in bold.

            • blazera@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Stick your fingers in your ears and yell as loud as you want, its not gonna make the well regulated portion go away.

              Not even beginning to mention the founders intentions of the constitution evolving over time, as the lethality, proliferation, and criminal usage of guns has skyrocketed since that amendment was written.

              • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                At least some of the founders had the intention of the second amendment allowing the population to overthrow tyrannical rulers.