On one hand, battery busses require lithium and rare earth metals which needs to be mined from a relatively short supply, as well as lots of fancy chemical processing which I’d wager produces plenty of byproducts, and batteries have a limited lifespan before needing to be replaced. On the other hand, trolley busses (the kind that gets power from overhead wires) require extensive infrastructure in the form of wires and poles, which require tons of metal (though much more abundant steel and aluminium) to produce and energy to install and maintain, and the wires also wear out from friction and also need to be replaced from time to time. Anyone know any papers comparing the sustainability of these two technologies? I’m also interested in how the wire-to-wheel energy efficiencies compare between them.

  • @poVoq
    link
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • @loki
      link
      13 years ago

      Hybrid is the way to go until we can be figure out better battery tech

      • @roastpotatothief
        link
        13 years ago

        Yes this.

        The best way to store energy is as fuel. You can even convert your electricity to fuel, and carry it in a fuel tank on the bus.

        I’d like to see a comparison between electric (overhead wire) and diesel (series hybrid) trains though. Why has there been a cultural transition from diesel to electric? There must be some advantage.

        • @poVoq
          link
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • @roastpotatothief
            link
            13 years ago

            Yes fuel cells could be great in the future.

            I’ve never heard of a “battery + overhead lines hybrid”. How does it make sense? If you have a battery then you wouldn’t charge it with overhead lines, you’d use a charging station. If you really don’t have enough charge for one journey, your second choice would probably be a removable locomotive or a removable battery.

            Petrol/diesel hybrids don’t need a conventional drivetrain. That’s the beauty of it. I can go into details if you like but there are several flavours of hybrid. You can have a lighter, more powerful, more reliable, more efficient, more ecological vehicle. And this is all really old and common technology. I just don’t see why pure electric is suddenly in fashion this decade. Batteries are getting better but so is everything. It doesn’t suddenly have a new capability it didn’t have 50 years ago.

            • @poVoq
              link
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator

              • @roastpotatothief
                link
                1
                edit-2
                3 years ago

                So you have all the expense/weight of needing a huge battery on the lorry. And you have all the expense/maintenance putting infrastructure along the highway.

                It sounds like the worst of both worlds. I can’t think of any major advantage to this approach, that would make it worthwhile.

                Not easier to just put charging stations on the highway?

                • @jelbana
                  link
                  1
                  edit-2
                  3 years ago

                  deleted by creator

                • @poVoq
                  link
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  deleted by creator

  • @AgreeableLandscapeOP
    link
    43 years ago

    Actually, I just thought of this: I (fairly rarely) see the trolley busses in my city driving with the wires detached, so they also have batteries presumably in case of emergency. But I don’t know what their battery only ranges are, so I don’t know if they have smaller batteries, or if the batteries last longer due to not being used most of the time?

    • @Slatlun
      link
      43 years ago

      My guess is that some of the wired buses don’t have batteries. More than once I’ve seen the ones around me come off their wires and stop, blocking multiple lanes of traffic (it happens in turns), to reattach. I imagine protocol would be to drive to a good stopping point before reattaching if that were possible. They were also in heavy use before any kind of practical battery vehicle hit the roads.

      • OrangeSlice
        link
        43 years ago

        Yeah trolleybuses have been around a pretty long time (particularly in really hilly cities like Seattle and San Francisco). Lots of transit agencies are experimenting with battery-electric buses, but trolleybuses (or some sort of hybrid trolleybus with a ~10 mile battery range) could probably work well for a lot of projects.

        Like you mention, one of the major issues is the bus getting detached in a turn, but using them on routes with few turns and plenty of range to get things lined up would go a long way on that.

    • @jelbana
      link
      1
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      deleted by creator