Eric Zuesse An obliquely-written news-report in the New York Times on January 18th headlined “U.S. Warms to Helping Ukraine Target Crimea” and subheaded “The Biden administration is considering the argument that Kyiv needs the power to strike at the Ukrainian peninsula annexed by Russia in 2014.” It reported that, “the Biden administration is finally starting

@shreddy_scientist Bruh, this thread is so cringe and riddled with misinformation that it simply makes me sick.

Can’t wait for Putler to be taken down and replaced with an actual democratic leader, or else have Ruzzia split apart into separate republics. In case you’re blind, the place is just the last European colonial empire and has turned into a full-blown faZchist state. If it weren’t for nukes, then a NATO/US invasion would only be an actual boon for Russia in this regard, as it would help it become more free and prosperous.

You should be all ashamed for supporting a dictatorial, terrorist state, that uses “anti-fascism” as a means of repressing dissent both outside and within.

Sleepless One
link
fedilink
711d

If it weren’t for the fact that the nuclear option is on the table, I would actually really like it if burgerland sent a bunch of its boots to be massacred by the Russians in You Crane.

Who do you think is going to operate those Abrams and Leopard tanks?

Poland reportedly already tried to send tanks with polish crews. This seems to indicate UA is out of crews.

Poland has reportedly sent spetsnaz already, so this is just the next step. US crews in US tanks, German troops in German tanks. Wonder if they’ll bother with Ukrainian uniforms even.

They might even get their grandpa uniforms from the closets, pretty sure it would be popular among their dear allies.

@tomasz
link
fedilink
-1211d

Fake news, Crimea is Ukraine. Even russians embassy admits so.

TankieReplyBot
bot account
link
fedilink
311d

A YouTube link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same video on Invidious, which is a YouTube frontend that protects your privacy:

Soviet Snake
link
fedilink
1211d

I think Russia really needs to capture their objectives and finish this war, these fuxking gringos are fucked up blood thirsty animals, they are collapsing and want to destroy the entire human species while shouting “liberty”.

@guojing
link
fedilink
410d

The objective is to demilitarize Ukraine and Nato. Russia is doing that by grinding down all the tanks, artillery and equipment which are being sent. Western arsenals are being completely depleted, and will take many years to rebuild. Capturing territory was never the goal for Russia.

Soviet Snake
link
fedilink
510d

I think, though, that capturing some territory was, or at the very least, is now a goal for Russia.

@guojing
link
fedilink
310d

Sure but it’s more of a secondary goal. And why rush to capture territory at huge losses when the enemy keeps sending troops which can easily be wiped out?

Soviet Snake
link
fedilink
-210d

Well, now there’s kind of a reason to not keep pushing it if the US wants to go full on nuclear annihilation. Maybe they’re just swinging dicks, though, but it’s scary.

@OsrsNeedsF2P
link
fedilink
-311d

First they’re gonna have to define objectives they can stick with

@pingveno
link
fedilink
-1011d

Good thing Crimea’s not in Russia, then.

Sleepless One
link
fedilink
711d

If Ukraine wants Crimea so bad they should take it. Oh wait, they can’t because they keep getting btfo.

@pingveno
link
fedilink
-3
edit-2
10d

Huh, that’s interesting. Wasn’t Russia the big bad wolf that turned out to be a sheep when its tank invasion got javelined and dragged off by tractors?

Meanwhile in the real world

About 10 days ago, a Russian tank that Shadow and a fellow Canadian — the sniper known as Wali — had been quietly stalking in the Donbas region of Eastern Ukraine turned and fired on them.

Two Ukrainian soldiers who were with them had ignored Wali’s advice a moment before by stepping outside the cover of their observation post — nothing more than a trench — for a cigarette.

Shadow — the nom de guerre of a former Canadian soldier from Sherbrooke, a member of the Royal 22nd Regiment who later served as a meteorological technician with the navy — had been about to join his Ukrainian friends when the tank opened up, landing a shell right between the two Ukrainians.

Shadow was blown back to the trench, his ears ringing from the explosion. He crawled up, poked his head outside and was greeted by a scene of utter carnage.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/ukraine-russia-canadian-forces-1.6443048

Bad thing that this has been explained to you many times on this site and you continue to regurgitate nonsense.

Soviet Snake
link
fedilink
811d

This news-story omitted to mention that according to Russian law, Crimea (which was part of Russia throughout 1783-1954 when the Soviet Union’s dictator, a Ukrainian, arbitrarily transferred it to Ukraine) was restored to Russia on 16 March 2014, when a vote by Crimea’s residents supported by over 90% the return of Crimea to being a part of Russia, and Russia accepted that application by the Crimean people, for Crimea to become again a part of Russia. None of this was mentioned in the NYT’s news-report, nor was the fact mentioned there that even U.S. polling of the residents of Crimea, both before and after the 2014 plebiscite there, found over 90% of respondents to want restoration of Crimea as being a part of Russia. All of that crucial information has been kept secret from the American people, and from the people in U.S.-allied countries — they don’t know it. The NYT’s article says only that Crimea is “the peninsula that President Vladimir V. Putin views as an integral part of his quest to restore past Russian glory.”

@pingveno
link
fedilink
-7
edit-2
10d

90% polling eh? Take a look at page 17 where a mere 23% want that option, then tell me with a straight face that 90% wasn’t essentially cooked up during an invasion by Russian special forces.

Edit: Note that around 12% of Crimea is made up of Crimea Taras. Given that they were the target of ethnic cleansing under the USSR, they’re unlikely to be warm to the idea of living under Russian rule. That alone should speak to how phony the referendum’s results are.

It’s absolutely amazing that you think that paper supports your argument. Let’s just look at a few polls from it:

A mere 15% of the people in Crimea consider themselves Ukrainian

Majority of people think that if they had to choose than Russia would be the economic bloc that Crimea should be in

Vast majority of people have positive view towards Russia

Meanwhile, the poll about autonomy in Ukraine is taken before 2014 when Ukraine decided to start doing ethnic cleansing.

I honestly can’t tell if you genuinely believe you own bullshit, or if you’re just trolling intentionally.

@pingveno
link
fedilink
-510d

Oh, believe me, it’s immensely fun trolling you, but I wouldn’t make a claim without backing it with at least something. I’ll just limit my claim here to this: the Russian referendum result of 90% is pure nonsense.

A mere 15% of the people in Crimea consider themselves Ukrainian

This is true, but leaves out a very important flip side: a mere 40% consider themselves Russian, hardly enough to form 90%. As I pointed out earlier, 15% are Tatars, who suffered ethnic cleansing at the hands of Russia’s predecessor, the Soviet Union. I kind of doubt that group has warm fuzzy feelings towards Russia, eh?

Majority of people think that if they had to choose than Russia would be the economic bloc that Crimea should be in

A lot of factors go into this answer, so drawing additional inferences based on the answer is premature. Case in point: Crimea is physically closer to much of Russia’s population, so from a practical standpoint there is likely more trade opportunity. Also of note, 17% chose Europe and 22% chose N/A or Don’t know. Only a tiny majority chose Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan. Hardly enough to support that 90% claim.

Vast majority of people have positive view towards Russia

Yup. But they also didn’t show negative views towards Europe or the US for the most part. You could argue that the 2014 revolution changed all that, but unless you have other data that I haven’t seen it would be without evidence. And no, Russia’s fake referendum does not count as data.

deleted by creator

@pingveno
link
fedilink
-4
edit-2
10d

The counterfactual that I’m arguing against is that referendum that Russia conducted had a result that made any sense. For that to be the case, people heavily favoring Russia would need to total up to the 90% that was supposedly the result. I don’t know enough about Crimea to argue about whether 50% might want to be annexed by Russia, so I’m not going to try.

Edit: It’s worth noting that Russia now has a pattern of behavior where they invade a region they wish to annex, hold a sham referendum that gets some absurdly high approval, and then the Russian Duma approves a law claiming the region for Russia. Now that Ukraine wants their territory back, the state media line is that they are threatening to invade Russia. And when that happens, get ready for some nuclear saber rattling!

That tiny majority is 53%.

Yup, and that is an incredibly slim majority to base an annexation claim on, especially when the question is economic. It hardly shows overwhelming fondness for Russia that would definitively translate into 90% support for annexation just a year later. As for Brexit, arguably the UK should have never left the EU without a strong majority. There is a reason why big decisions often require a supermajority.

Oh, believe me, it’s immensely fun trolling you, but I wouldn’t make a claim without backing it with at least something. I’ll just limit my claim here to this: the Russian referendum result of 90% is pure nonsense.

It’s not pure nonsense because referendum happened after a coup and after Ukrainian nationalists started murdering people on the streets. If you don’t understand how that might firm up public opinion in Ukraine where majority of people consider themselves Russians what else is there to say about you.

This is true, but leaves out a very important flip side: a mere 40% consider themselves Russian, hardly enough to form 90%. As I pointed out earlier, 15% are Tatars, who suffered ethnic cleansing at the hands of Russia’s predecessor, the Soviet Union. I kind of doubt that group has warm fuzzy feelings towards Russia, eh?

The question wasn’t regarding whether 90% of people consider themselves to be Russian, but whether they would rather be part of Russia or Ukraine run by nationalists. This is the lack of intellectual honesty I’ve come to expect from you. Also, absolutely hilarious that you pretend to speak as if you know the first thing about what people in Crimea actually think.

Yup. But they also didn’t show negative views towards Europe or the US for the most part. You could argue that the 2014 revolution changed all that, but unless you have other data that I haven’t seen it would be without evidence. And no, Russia’s fake referendum does not count as data.

I’ve presented you with other data many times on this site. You continue to ignore it and act as if I haven’t done so. Go clown somewhere else. Nobody is buying your shit here.

@pingveno
link
fedilink
-310d

I refuse to accept the results of a clearly fraudulent referendum. I was incorrect on the official result: 97% in favor with a 83% turnout. That’s pure nonsense. It smacks of someone who was like “Eh… 100% is probably too extreme, we should smack a few percentage points off.” Do you actually believe that? Crimea may be legitimately in favor of being part of Russia. I don’t know. But it doesn’t take a genius to figure out that the referendum was invalid.

Your opinion on the validity of the referendum notwithstanding, it is an undeniable fact that vast majority of people in Crimea would prefer to be part of Russia. Given that is the case then it very clearly does make sense for Crimea to be part of Russia. On what possible basis could you argue that Crimea should be subjugated by Ukrainian nationalist against the will of the people of Crimea?

It’s curious to learn that US presidents are never on a glorious quest. In a way, it’s honest: the US has no glorious history to speak of.

Arsen6331 ☭
link
fedilink
2011d

Well, I hope the next sapient species that comes along doesn’t kill themselves off.

Start carving Marx’s words in deep letters on granite blocks so the warning survives. We don’t want them to be like us; finding out that communist dinosaurs wrote on perishable parchment.

Great idea, although I think it would be better to carve Marx’s works on Mount Rushmore as a warning to future generations should America start WWIII.

TankieReplyBot
bot account
link
fedilink
211d

A YouTube link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same video on Invidious, which is a YouTube frontend that protects your privacy:

They’re that sure in those anti-missile systems then? Been nice knowing you all then

World News
!worldnews
Create a post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

  • 0 users online
  • 8 users / day
  • 29 users / week
  • 79 users / month
  • 316 users / 6 months
  • 2.56K subscribers
  • 2.99K Posts
  • 7.96K Comments
  • Modlog