Theoretically this (mostly) sounds fine. If there were a revolution before then and therefore people don’t “own” anything (no private property), they instead collectively own the means of production and borrow public things when they need them. However, knowing the WEF, it’s clear they are trying to trick us into thinking our “benevolent” bourgeois overlords will just allow us to have nice stuff once technology has progressed enough. Whereas in real life, what would happen is the capitalist class would genocide everyone who isn’t necessary to provide for their luxurious life.
Even without reading the article, from the description alone it seems to be purposefully mixing up private property and personal property.
it’s a bizarre idea of trying to look peak imperialism as some kind of “mutant communism”, or maybe the article tries to make a metaphor of capitalism being the true “gommie boogerman”
Welcome to my city - or should I say, “our city”.
It’s literally mimicking those memes with Bugs bunny and the Soviet flag.
Then, when clean energy became free,
Might as well stop reading right there. Free energy? In a profit-driven system? Keep dreaming.
This is beyond braindead. There is 0% chance of this ever being a thing in the rotten capitalist core. Ever.
