trash
@linkert
link
78M

Cool beans Dortmund!

Tanka
link
48M

here is the link to the original German news.

A translated quote from the article:

“With this resolution, city policy claims the shaping of municipal digital sovereignty and digital participation for itself. The resolution means a reversal of the burden of proof in favour of open source software and at the expense of proprietary software. In the future, the administration will have to justify why open source software cannot be used for every proprietary software application. Based on the report of the Dortmund city administration on the investigation of the potentials of Free Software and Open Standards, Open Source Software is understood in the sense of Free Software.”

tl;dr

"In the future, the administration will have to justify why open source software cannot be used for every proprietary software application. "

this is the most important part. i hope this example will inspire many other cities>

“Libre software” means software that respects users’ freedom and community. Roughly, it means that the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software.

In particular, four freedoms define Free Software:

The freedom to run the program, for any purpose.

Placing restrictions on the use of Free Software, such as time ("30 days trial period", "license expires January 1st, 2004") purpose ("permission granted for research and non-commercial use", "may not be used for benchmarking") or geographic area ("must not be used in country X") makes a program non-free.

The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs.

Placing legal or practical restrictions on the comprehension or modification of a program, such as mandatory purchase of special licenses, signing of a Non-Disclosure-Agreement (NDA) or - for programming languages that have multiple forms or representation - making the preferred human way of comprehending and editing a program ("source code") inaccessible also makes it proprietary (non-free). Without the freedom to modify a program, people will remain at the mercy of a single vendor.

The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor.

Software can be copied/distributed at virtually no cost. If you are not allowed to give a program to a person in need, that makes a program non-free. This can be done for a charge, if you so choose.

The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements to the public, so that the whole community benefits.

Not everyone is an equally good programmer in all fields. Some people don't know how to program at all. This freedom allows those who do not have the time or skills to solve a problem to indirectly access the freedom to modify. This can be done for a charge.
  • 0 users online
  • 2 users / day
  • 2 users / week
  • 13 users / month
  • 34 users / 6 months
  • 924 subscribers
  • 61 Posts
  • 137 Comments
  • Modlog