• Neato@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Petty theft and similar crimes are almost always borne out of desperation. When you can’t feed your family, have zero job prospects, or feel like the world won’t allow you more than the barest subsistence, people turn to crime.

    Vast majority of people aren’t going to start mugging strangers when they are doing OK just because they want more. Personal risk of harm is just too great. Those types of thieves generally perpetrate white-collar and financial crimes.

    Bottom left yellow person would be swayed if his initial motives were real. But the last motive shows yellow person is actually desperate, so while increasing guilt, is unlikely to fix the core issue and sway them.

    • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are also people who are desperate because they’re addicted to drugs, and safety net programs aren’t gonna do much about that. Not really a counterargument, just a sidebar.

    • Slowy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are there pro-theft communities that support stealing directly from other (not super rich) individuals? I don’t think corporations are victims of the oppressive system, so stealing from them is still ethically congruent

        • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          To be fair, if much of the money goes straight up the chain to corporate, then stealing is still hurting corporate’s bottom line. It’s just that it’s also doing a lot of damage to the local branch, which could be hurting locals and creating food deserts.

          (I’m not a theft advocate, btw.)

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s common in restaurants, but not so much in supermarkets. I think the biggest/most well known supermarket that franchises is sav a lot.

          Safeway, Kroger, King Sooper etc are not and in fact own multiple brands. Kroger for instance owns not Only Kroger stores but Fred Meyer and King Soopers and a few others.

          They’re free for the pickings as far as I’m concerned along with Walmart, I might not steal myself but I’ll be turning the other way rq if I see someone else doing it

      • 100_percent_a_bot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re still shafting poor people when you steal stuff from local shops, even if they belong to large corporations. They usually start locking up items that are frequently stolen and sometimes even close down entirely. This is how food deserts are made.

        • Slowy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think that’s the main problem contributing to food deserts. In my city, zoning regulations and anticompetitive contracts have created them… so, shitty business practices and nimbyism.

          • 100_percent_a_bot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not the main problem by a long shot but it’s certainly impacting existing businesses. For some of them it’s just the final nail in the coffin.

            Dumbass nimby boomers and zoning are a whole other can of worms. If you can spare the free time to annoy your city council with your pet peeves (which said boomer nimbys often can) you can get a lot of things done.

      • Staccato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s also how you destroy the environment of the Niger River Delta.

        You want to take out the pumps, not the pipelines.

        (Calm down NSA, I’m saying this purely in jest)

        • applebusch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I get what you’re saying, but there’s practical considerations. There’s just too many pumps for that to be feasible. Only a couple pipes though.

          • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            On the other hand, if you blow up all the pumps, it takes more resources to replace those than it would to simply repair a couple pipes.

  • blindbunny
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why tf would you steal from a person when there’s perfectly evil companies to steal from?

    • Hegar@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That bottom left comic would actually play out with blue guy getting stabbed, and his wallet taken.

      By someone who had just said that they’re engaging in crime specifically for the activism angle?

      No offense, but I don’t think you’re qualified to know what would actually play out when one politically aware bipedal dog tries to mug another.

      • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        No offense, but I don’t think you’re qualified to know what would actually play out when one politically aware bipedal dog tries to mug another.

        Brand new sentence.