Lofi published this on Reddit asking:
I came across this paper - https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202255841 (through r/Open_Access_tracking)
It made me think: Most of the discourse I know about research materials and open science is centered around the idea of public access.
But maybe public access is not vital? What do you think about providing controlled, on-demand access? I mean, public access is preferable, but in practice, public access deters some scientists (due to various reasons, not necessarily IP as the paper assumes), and so we are ending with no access at all. Perhaps providing some access is better than nothing.
What do you think - would society benefit from such on-demand access or should we insist on public access only?
A Reddit link was detected in your post. Here are links to the same location on Teddit and Libreddit, which are Reddit frontends that protect your privacy.
