• @PolandIsAStateOfMind
      link
      101 year ago

      It seems that this was carefully deliberated to have exact zero impact but sound like an actual reform.

      And now dem shills and other western pseudoleft will be spamming everywhere “Biden freed convicts so he’s the leftiest president ever and also least racist”.

      • krolden
        link
        41 year ago

        Thank you I have been looking for an actual number of released prisoners and all I got was a bunch of headlines saying ‘thousands pardoned’.

      • @pingveno
        link
        -2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s definitely not zero impact. Any felony convictions stick around for a long time on background checks and weigh down people’s prospects in careers, housing, and any number of other realms of life. Also, states often follow the federal government’s lead, like we saw with the 90’s crime bill and 3 strikes laws. But yes, realistically this should just be seen as a mainly symbolic first step rather than as a fundamental change in itself.

        It’s also important to note that it’s difficult to undo these policies. First, pardons have to be applied carefully. There are cases where people got out of a more serious charge by pleading down to simple possession. There will need to be a case-by-case review. The other is that Biden is not a dictator. He is bound by Congress, which currently is resisting efforts to reschedule marijuana. The politics of this is complex. The majority of the populace wants legalization, but political distortions built into the US’s political system are preventing that change from going into effect.

        • krolden
          link
          21 year ago

          But yes, realistically this should just be seen as a mainly symbolic first step rather than as a fundamental change in itself.

          More like platitudes to get more votes from the uninforned

          • @pingveno
            link
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Perhaps, but the discussion I’m currently seeing on Reddit shows that people are aware that ultimately it’s up to the states to make meaningful changes on the number of people incarcerated for marijuana possession, as well as other progress on marijuana policy. Biden’s banking on it to a certain extent, since it brings up a winning issue in a number of close races. This is an issue where the Republican party has lagged behind even their own voters, so it gives the Democrats some advantage.

            • krolden
              link
              21 year ago

              I was just reading the discussion on reddit and it feels like a bunch of gpt3 bots going at it.

    • @AgreeableLandscapeOPM
      link
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Damn. Wasn’t too familiar with weed law in the US but seeing this, yeah. This is bad.

  • krolden
    link
    31 year ago

    Reposting from another post about the same thing in hopes to get morediscussion

    If he really gave a shit he would decriminalize all drugs. There’s very few people charged federally for weed possession which makes this whole thing a joke. He doesn’t actually give a shit about these people he just wants the good publicity this will somehow bring. Disgusting.

    Oh and disband the DEA while you’re at it. Those people are fucking terrible.

    • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
      link
      21 year ago

      US brand “war on drugs” is nothing but war on poor, especially black poor.

      • @pingveno
        link
        41 year ago

        Yeah, especially give the dismal state of public defenders. A justice system cannot be truly just if the defense for poor people barely exists and the defense for rich people can spend oodles of time mounting a full fledged defense.

        • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
          link
          -11 year ago

          Yeah the law, just as entire state, serves the ruling class, and is a weapon in class war. The access to it was historically always restricted for working class by many ways.

          • @pingveno
            link
            21 year ago

            The SCOTUS decision that established the requirements for public defenders, Gideon v. Wainwright, was part of the Warren Court. That era in Supreme Court history brought US law forward by leaps and bounds in ways that people now don’t fully appreciate. The government had a lot more leeway to abuse citizens before then. Unfortunately, the current conservative court is largely a reaction to those “activist judges” and seeks to reverse the progress of that era. Good if you’re a business owner, Christian, non-LGBTQ+, or white. Bad otherwise.

      • krolden
        link
        21 year ago

        Is there any reason why a president couldn’t decriminalize all drug possession with an executive order? The drug scheduling system is a complete joke. Especially since its become ever moreapparentl that schedule 1 drugs ‘with no medicinal value’ are actually shown to have much more value than current drugs being prescribed for pain management and mental health.