Seeing wealthy ppl joke about not being able to do laundry or get themselves a glass of water, is so gross to me.

For the love of Stalin these ppl need to be put in gulags / re-education centers asap.

  • Catradora-Stalinism☭
    link
    fedilink
    212 years ago

    The fucking romanticism about this disgusts me to my core. These people could be doing infinitely better things, but they live and work like slaves. ITS WRONG! The system is not okay! But Neo-liberals and their constituents have such a weird complex about these dystopian or feudal aspects of society!

    • @panic@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      172 years ago

      At the very least, they have their own families. Why wouldn’t they want to be caring for them and their own homes?

      Domestic workers lives are consumed by their employers AND they’re forced into the weird intimacy “they’re part of the family”.

  • DankZedong
    link
    fedilink
    19
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I had a thing with a royal once (daughter of an earl I think it was, I have no clue how that shit works nor do I care) for a very short time but got to a mansion once. Even for these lower royalty there were servants. Proper weird people.

    These people are forced to do everything you want which just creeped me out. Want drinks? Stay where you are, they got it. Food? Same. Clothing? Same. A drive? Here’s the chauffeur.

    Like, be useful and do something yourself. Even the girl was weird and had some sort of normal people fetish it seemed.

  • savoy
    link
    fedilink
    172 years ago

    It’s also incredibly common in Latin America and not just among the wealthiest echelon. And it’s nearly always lighter Latinos employing darker-skinned.

    There’s the classic attempt at justifying it as well, that maids are “part of the family”, with a lot of them (in the wealthier houses) living either full-time or part-time in the house they clean.

    • Muad'DibberOP
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You ever see the movie Roma? I’d love to see someone do an ML analysis of that film… iirc it tries to do the same thing (IE “humanize” the class subordination of the main character, who’s a maid working for a wealthy family). I saw it way later, so I have no idea about the communist discourse around the movie.

      • savoy
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        I haven’t, but it looks like I’m going to have to add it to my to-watch list

  • @panic@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    142 years ago

    Yes. Particularly when they compare them to caregivers. You just know they would laugh in the face of someone who needs assistance to use the toilet.

  • @Munrock@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    142 years ago

    Over on reddit r/readscarepod someone posted screenshots of a domestic helper website in Singapore describing the different nationalities you can get for a domestic helper. OP accurately described it as akin to talking about dog breeds.

    It’s fucking disgusting.

    • @Giyuu@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      COVID was so good for the foreigner population remaining in China. It was a long overdue culling. All the SerpentZA types are 2 years gone. Most of the liberal colonial wannabes, the consoomer tourists left, and they were mostly unable to return when they realized their error. Fuck em.

      Glorious just glorious. Thank you sharing this.

    • @panic@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      There are edge cases ofc. Such as taking care of elderly people but again it can be argued that capitalist work ethic means that family members aren’t given the time to adequately take care of their elders and etc.

      Caregivers are generally performing unpaid labour for their family or close friends. They are expected to hold a full-time job while giving care or receive poverty level checks from the government.

      This is a different subject than hiring domestic workers and it’s more related to disability rights, but people are ignored by the government the same way.

      • Neptium
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        I do agree with your sentiment but I have to ask you to elaborate on how caregiving and domestic labour are separate issues?

        What differentiates caregiving and domestic work? Are they not both performing the same duties?

        Unless you mean the key differentiator is that for caregivers, the work is a necessity, but for domestic labourers it isn’t?

        • @panic@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Domestic labour can be a part of caregiving. But domestic workers aren’t performing the duties of a caregiver. Caregivers specifically help disabled, ill and/or injured people with medication, personal hygiene, feeding, going to the toilet, etc.

          The difference would be the type of role the person is performing. A domestic worker (or “maid”) is working as a servant for an entire household. A caregiver works (takes care of) the care receiver.

          There are professional caregivers but the majority of caregivers are unpaid family and friends struggling against the capitalist system.

          Edit: remember that work and labour don’t mean the same thing.

  • Bury The Right
    link
    fedilink
    122 years ago

    My mother worked as a housekeeper for petty rich old people. I never thought too much about it about since my mom was someone who naturally liked cleaning and tidying stuff up. The kinds of bourgeoisie that piss me off are the ones that would fret over something like a tiny scratch on their refrigerator.

  • honestly the fact that servants/maids exist in the first place to me show the inherent limitations to the patriarchal family structure. in the same way that traditional and productive labor was socialized, reproductive labor should also be socialized and/or automated, and this would require a different familial structure.

    because the division of reproductive labor is the primary contradiction of patriarchy, socializing reproductive labor is the main way that you can actually liberate non-men and thus smash the patriarchy. in this sense, maids/servants as they exist now very clearly constitute an unequal division of reproductive labor, offloading it onto less fortunate women and supporting the decaying patriarchal family unit.

      • interesting story. i have thought about how, even within market socialism, having a low cost of labor makes for much cheaper prepared food. continually decreasing the necessary amount of weekly hours as you decrease market dominance and overproduction, means people have more time to eat out. as restaurants become less market-dependent, it may become healthy enough to eat at them every day regardless of the restaurant. and, as this all occurs food production may look more and more localized like what you described and less about the production of nonperishable snacks. even now it can serve as a happy medium so that everyone doesn’t have to have a full oven or what have you.