• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      163 years ago

      That won’t change the policy going forward because whoever replaces her will represent the same business interests she does. China is the only major growing economy, and EU economies are shrinking. They can’t afford not to work with China going forward.

      I think this will be a similar geopolitical realignment to the one we saw after WW2 with US holding all the cards while all the other major economies were devastated.

      • @pimento@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        123 years ago

        Agreed. German car companies are making a huge percentage of their sales in China, and they dont want to lose that. And the car companies are very powerful politically. So China keeps them happy by doing business, and avoids direct confrontation. Really a great strategy.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          103 years ago

          Yeah, it’s amazing how capitalists have no choice but to pursue strategy that’s counter to their long term interest. It’s a version of prisoner’s dilemma for them. Unless all the companies agreed unanimously to pull out of China then no companies can afford to do so.

      • Camarada Forte
        link
        fedilink
        103 years ago

        That won’t change the policy going forward because whoever replaces her will represent the same business interests she does.

        Makes sense

  • @TeethOrCoat@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    33 years ago

    Wasn’t Germany one of the countries that backed the US on the XJ and HK situations? The blocs are there already. It’s just an imperialist bloc vs an anti-imperialist bloc.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      23 years ago

      It looks like there’s a break developing between US and Germany. Public opinion of US is at all time low, and my impression is that Germany realizes its positioned to become the top dog in EU right now. China is going to be an important trading partner for them in order to wean off their dependence on US. So, I expect them to make some preformative noises, but to direct policy towards increasing ties with China.

      • @TeethOrCoat@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        13 years ago

        I’ll believe it when they start backing PRC in UN voting. I don’t trust them to do even that though as long as US troops are stationed in the country.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          23 years ago

          Them staying neutral is already a huge win to be honest. I doubt they’ll openly side with RPC against US in the foreseeable future, but not actively working to back US against RPC is something. I think the most important part here is that EU will end up having deeper economic ties with China now, and this will make the belt road that much more effective.

          US strategy was to create a threat of a naval blockade against China and to be able to control their ability to ship goods that way. Belt road makes that strategy obsolete. This is precisely why we’re seeing US push for conflict in Kashmir and destabilize Xinxiang. The goal is to put a wrench into the belt road initiative. It doesn’t look like it’s working so far though.