On a reddit comment I saw some Republican apologia (they don’t think direct cash payment is the best way to stimulate the economy, it’s because of the deficit) so I got thinking and realised I don’t have concrete knowledge of why they oppose it. Is it because it will squeeze money out of handouts that corporations that lobby them are going to receive?

Also is it true that Republicans are against the stimulus while the Democrats are for it?

Thanks.

  • @Nevar
    link
    7
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • lemmygrabberOP
      link
      fedilink
      23 years ago

      Why would Republicans oppose money being allocated to Afghanistan, Syria, Israel etc. when they are at the forefront of imperialist warmongering?

      My question was about the $2000 stimulus package. I think the current one that is proposed has $600 per American.

      • @Nevar
        link
        3
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        deleted by creator

        • Muad'Dibber
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          @ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml

          I think though that the republican party has internally become split between Trump supporters and Neoliberal imperialists, much like the democratic party is split between AOC progressives and neoliberal imperialists like Biden and Harris.

          Yup I agree here, its mainly infighting between republicans, some being pro austerity, some starting to go (vaguely) anti-austerity (or at least enough) to save their own heads. Trump as the most visible republican is trying to put himself in the second camp by upping the amount from $600 to $2000, and he’s got the support of even the “progressive” socdem camp of Bernie and AOC trying to fight for his proposal.

          Also I think it should go without saying but cash infusions like this or UBI are a right-wing strategy right out of the austrian school, better immediate things the US should pass (that its socdems aren’t even pushing for) is a moratorium on rent, evictions, utility bills, healthcare bills, and push for more unemployment benefits which have run out for most people now.

          • lemmygrabberOP
            link
            fedilink
            13 years ago

            I can’t imagine any Republican being anti-austerity. I feel Trump rooting for $2000 stimulus is a straight PR move and he will never put an actual effort into materialising it. That said, yeah they are split in two camps for sure: pro- and anti-Trump.

            You’re right that moratoria would much better. Maybe the fight over stimulus is to smokescreen these possibilities.

  • T34 [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    43 years ago

    it will squeeze money out of handouts that corporations that lobby them are going to receive?

    That’s part of it. The bigger picture IMO is that the declining rate of profit is making austerity necessary for the survival of capitalism. Republicans are the reliably pro-austerity party.

    There are also factions within the bourgeoisie. Many multinational corporations have figured out how to hide their profits outside US borders, so they might not mind more taxation on everyone else’s profits. They might have more to gain if US consumers had more spending money. I imagine there would also be a factional difference between tech capitalists (represented by Pelosi) and financial capitalists (Schumer).

    Then there’s the political angle. Some Democratic politicians actually want the $2000 stimulus, others just want to be known as the people who would totally give you a stimulus if only you gave us a Senate majority!! (And if they get one, then overriding the filibuster to pass a stimulus would suddenly become too uncivil for them.)