You must log in or register to comment.
(or: revolution does not require violence)
Where did you get that part from? I don’t see such a statement in the article.
Its been more than a week since I read that article, and that sentence is really my own interpretation of it. What I mean is that not succumbing to this western nihilism described in the article, is also a revolutionary act on its own. Sure a violent revolution is necessary sooner or later to take over state power, but only a small number of people will ever take part in that. Which is why this view that revolution = violence is nonsense to me.