Now that LXQt is a thing, is LXDE officially abandoned as a desktop environment? I personally like GTK more than Qt, and LXDE is also lighter on resources, especially since most Linux apps are GTK, which LXQt would have to use memory to load the libraries for. Is there any chance that LXDE could continue to get support? Otherwise, how likely is it that it would be forked and continue to be developed for like Unity was?

Failing all those, are there any actively developed desktop environments that use GTK and are as lightweight as LXDE?

  • Ephera
    link
    43 years ago

    The official communication from the team behind LXDE/-Qt some years ago, was that LXDE would comtinue to be maintained. There is also still prominently the Raspberry Pi Foundation which develops their custom PIXEL desktop, based on LXDE.

    However, LXDE is GTK2. It won’t work with high-res screens, nor with Wayland. So, in its current form, it will eventually go the way of the Dodo.
    You should also mind that many applications these days are GTK3, so you won’t really get a memory overlap with LXDE there.

    And they decided to port to Qt instead of GTK3, because they found Qt to be lighter (and easier to work with etc.).
    A currently developed DE pretty much has to be GTK3 or Qt5 (or another maintained toolkit), meaning they can’t really be as light as LXDE on GTK2 (unless they drop features or optimize it really well).

  • @je_vv
    link
    3
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

  • @knock
    link
    2
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • SeerLite
      link
      13 years ago

      I tried XFCE on my old laptop and it just was too slow for everything. Opening anything (even menus) took more than 10 seconds (keep in mind this is a really old laptop). LXDE worked a lot better, I even got surprised at how snappy it was compared to it. This was on Arch, so minimal just like you said.

      I’m just saying, LXDE still has its place with really old hardware where resource usage is critical, and can’t be fully replaced with XFCE in all cases (but I do agree XFCE works fine on newer stuff).

  • @akagusu
    link
    13 years ago

    It is developed but you have to use a distro that ship lxde packages or build lxde yourself. You can try xfce which is also light on resouces.

    • @AgreeableLandscapeOPM
      link
      33 years ago

      I actually heard that XFCE is about as resource heavy as KDE these days, but surprisingly, it’s because KDE has made amazing strides in optimization, not because XFCE is bloated. Though LXDE is still the lightest full desktop environment by a significant margin, only beat by barebones window managers.

      • Rose
        link
        13 years ago

        I’ve even been hearing that some people are finding Plasma being lighter than XFCE even. It’s really amazing how far they’ve come.

      • @knock
        link
        1
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        deleted by creator