• @CITRUS@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    252 years ago

    I too noose construction workers in full uniform via their chest.

    God I wish all these libs could learn Chinese and see for themselves.

    • ☭ Comrade Pup Ivy 🇨🇺M
      link
      fedilink
      132 years ago

      I can’t read Chinese, but this to me stands out clear as day as a safety harness test, eveb without being able to read anything.

      Sidenote, if anyone who can read Chinese would be kind enough to translate, that would be much apreciated.

      • @CITRUS@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        Of course, but this happens time and time again with little stuff, I mean the language barrier is one of Western propaganda’s strongest tools

        • ☭ Comrade Pup Ivy 🇨🇺M
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          I understand, I have run into bigger issues with the language barrier recently, not large issues, but more important than a sign saying safety harness demonstration.

            • ☭ Comrade Pup Ivy 🇨🇺M
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              I doubt it, I think there will be a dominant language, and probably a large consolidation of languages, likely arround the current the current writing systems, and I feel it will be a loss to the world, but I am wiling to hear push back on that.

              • @CITRUS@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                22 years ago

                I dunno the thought just came to me. Or a better description is it rose to the surface. I know that we have the ability to translate written articles and comments decently enough in the the big languages, which will get better. But how will we speak to each other, or how will we be able translate through a picture, or how do we know these translators are in the right hands (what if they get so advanced, they can lie to you about what the other language is saying? Now normal this would be easily disproven, but libs are too sinophobic to second guess)

                I think under a world socialist system, humanity could build a synthetic global language. I’ve heard that there is a international phenetic alphabet, though I don’t know too much about or how “international” it is.

                • @afellowkid@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  4
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  The international phonetic alphabet is mostly used as a transcription tool for phonetic notation. It’s not really used for communication purposes but more for representing sounds made at the various positions considered possible by the human mouth, to varying degrees of specificity (you can be more or less specific with it depending on what you are using IPA for). Most of the characters it uses are based in latin script but its purpose is mainly to make phonetic notations rather than be used for general writing purposes, generally each language benefits from having a writing system that suits its own particular qualities and using the IPA to write would not be very practical.

                  As for constructed languages, I think there is a lot of resistance to them among people in general at the moment, for a multitude of reasons, but I think they are an underexplored field that could benefit people some day. At the very least they are interesting to create, study, and speak. I do think natural languages are going to continue to be predominant for the foreseeable future and constructed languages will probably remain in the realm of idealists and niche hobbyists for a long time.

              • JucheBot1988
                link
                fedilink
                22 years ago

                I think there will be a lot of local languages, with large regions (united by broad economic/political interests) each having a single lingua franca – say German or French or Russian or Mandarin. That was the model within the Soviet Union. Local languages were protected, and you went to school and conversed in the language of your particular ethnicity. But everybody also learned Russian, so that people from the various republics could communicate with each other. Liberals call this “cultural imperialism,” but really, it was just practical. In many regions of the Soviet Union, such as the Caucasus, you had a stunning variety of local languages, each of them highly complex and developed; for economic reasons, there had to be a single language everybody understood. To have this be Russian, the language most widely spoken in the USSR, simply made sense, and moreover – because a utilitarian argument could be made for it – was the closest thing to a politically neutral decision.

            • @electrodynamica@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              I feel like English, French, and Mandarin are already international standards. I doubt there will ever be one singular. Isn’t that the reason they invented Esperanto anyway?

              • @CITRUS@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                Well yeah there are international standards already (thanks colonialism). But I guess I’m imagining a distant future where in a communist world, you could travel anywhere and talk to anyone under the international tongue (International is probably meaningless, at that point nations have probably disolved). Not familiar with Esperanto, but is that all latin languages combined? Will look into it. You know what you could also in a communist society teach people fluency in big languages, but isn’t with our brains you’ll always favor one?

                • @electrodynamica@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Yeah, imperial languages reign. It’s interesting that older empires such as Spain and Arabia have had their languages splinter into 100s of dialects, some almost unintelligible to a native speaker of the original dialect.

                  I think what might happen in a unified world is something similar to India, where each ethnicity has their own language, regions have their own language, and then the whole country has the common language of Hindi.

                  but isn’t with our brains you’ll always favor one?

                  I think it’s context dependant like in India. It’s really just more practical. Language being about communicating ideas, it makes sense that the same ideas would be expressed differently in different contexts. Sometimes even friend groups have their own language, or even a set of twin siblings.

                  To use one language for everything would be very cumbersome. Imagine writing a low level hardware driver in Visual Basic 😉

                  Edit: it might even make sense to go in the other direction. Like for example law should have it’s own language, with it’s own words and sentence structure. Trying to cram it into English for example has clearly been a failure. And a few jargon words stolen from latin aren’t nearly enough. Biology is a little better with their custom grammar and pseudo Greek word construction, but even that would be helped by a whole cloth new language.

  • Does anyone know what the words even say 🤣. I can imagine some dude just looking at this, not speaking a letter of Chinese, and still believing this at face value.

      • @frippa
        link
        42 years ago

        IT’S A SECRET CCP LANGUAGE THAT ONLY CHINESE PEOPLE WITH CBIPS IMPLANTED IN THEIR BRAINS CAN UNDERSTAND! 1!1/1/1

  • nixfreak
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    LOL , no way someone actually thought this was a hanging.