I think they clearly expressed they were going through some hard times. I don’t think that’s necessarily a sin. And I don’t think one comment we all disagree (landlords) is a good lone reason to ban. Did I miss something? Not trying to stir the pot I just think patience and compassion should always come first.

  • DankZedong
    link
    fedilink
    24
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Like others said, he had some very negative views in his comment history. He had them for a while now and he was spreading a very negative message from time to time.

    That being said, he also mentioned he was going through some hard times.

    To me it always seemed like he was genuinely confused about some aspects of ML. I don’t think he acted in bad faith. He simply didn’t understand some things and coupled with some mental health problems he may not have been able to always see the point we were trying to make.

    I’m not a mod/admin, so I have no say in this, but I personally think a ban is too harsh. He had some good contributions to the site as well, be it through posts or comments. I don’t think we should start banning people just because they don’t always agree with the popular take. Part of why I like this place is because I feel people can always discuss things, which is a great part of how we can learn over here. Engaging in debate is something that gets mentioned here a lot but somehow a user disagreeing with some points gets banned. I don’t think that’s right. Especially when the user is, in my opinion, not acting in bad faith.

    • Comrade AppleDash
      link
      fedilink
      172 years ago

      Yes, we need to be better than the larger platforms that drove us for this exact reason (r/communism, Reddit in general, etc.). I remember forums like r/communism being much more diverse and open to differing opinions even a few years ago, and it was what made the community so accessible to a larger audience that wouldn’t have otherwise bothered. I feel like we need more of that here. We need to be more tolerant of people’s different takes on ML and socialism in general, while also using facts and evidence to disprove them.

      • KiG V2OP
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        I am also very in favor of this because of radicalization. I have absolutely no experience running or moderating any sort of online community so I can appreciate that this might be dumb, but to me I wouldn’t even ban openly belligerent liberals or fascists in hopes of working the long game and changing their perspective slowly behind closed doors (or, at the very least, the minds of silent lurkers represented by such people representing their ideologies having their points torn apart). I know the risk of corruption though, if for example GZD or lemmygrad had done that I would have been a severe risk of slowly losing its ML backbone, there’s definitely pros and cons to it.

      • DankZedong
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I can see where you’re coming from. I saw his comments on landlords too and I even thought out a long reply disagreeing with him, but I didn’t post it (don’t know why really, probably because it was late already). I also don’t want my reply to be seen as a somewhat pro-landlord reply. I am 100% against landlords.

        Maybe I am too kind for him. I try to look for chances in people and to me he did not seem lost or something, just in a bad place. But then again I have a lot of patience with people, sometimes maybe too much.

        I still don’t fully agree on banning him but like I said, I’m not a mod/admin so I don’t have a say in that. It’s too bad because there were also good intentions from him, but I agree that he should also put in the effort to improve himself. We can only do so much. I hope he can adjust his visions and find some peace of mind.

      • KiG V2OP
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        I can see merit to both sides of this conversation.

        I guess to show all my cards this is just very personal for me because in several different ways I was a shitty person for a long time in my life. It took me a long time to change and a longer time for it to be obvious to an outside observer. I’m not a total idealist “all people can change!,” I know plenty of people IRL that if given the best resources that humanity has to offer for the remainder or their lifetime they would still likely be just the same, and the reality is people DON’T have the time nor such resources. But I try to repeatedly give people the benefit of the doubt and try really hard even when there is no surface level changes because I know how long it can take for something like that to manifest into positive change.

        To be cold and pragmatic, “But is it worth the effort?” is also a reasonable question to ask, although it’s also hard to gauge somebody’s “worth” especially on the internet (not that I like thinking under such terms either).

        Like I said, I can see both sides. I’m still not feeling about the ban but I’m not gonna throw a fit over it either and I respect whatever the final verdict is and the reasons behind it.

  • ☭CommieWolf☆
    link
    fedilink
    202 years ago

    I’m very conflicted on his ban. I always felt suspicious seeing his post history. It seemed that he was always either deliberately trying to get attention by making controversial statements, or he was genuinely depressed and needed someplace to express himself.

    The landlord take was probably the straw that broke the camel’s back. He was already constantly spreading pessimism and doomerist attitude, and it could be argued that it may have been an attempt at infiltrating and bringing down morale or something.

    I’m just worried that if he wasn’t acting in bad faith we’ve just taken away an outlet of expression from someone who was in a really bad place and may have nowhere else to go.

      • ☭CommieWolf☆
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Well, that is true, although banning them for voicing their (definitely flawed) opinion doesn’t really help anyone. Those of us who know better won’t be turned into landlord apologists, and those who don’t would learn why that opinion is flawed by reading the responses from better informed users. If they were combative or disrespectful then a ban is completely warranted, but from what I can see this was not the case.

    • Ratette (she/her)
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      “I’m just worried that if he wasn’t acting in bad faith we’ve just taken away an outlet of expression from someone who was in a really bad place and may have nowhere else to go.”

      Couldn’t have said it better myself.

      Edit: ffs my spelling is shit

    • KiG V2OP
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Yes that’s my exact worry. I figured severely depressed was the case, and of course need for some attention plays into that, they self professed being very lonely and we all need some human attention (even if it sometimes manifests in bad ways). I don’t think bad faith per se, definitely a little addicted to the doomerism but depression is a very powerful self replicating force than can turn logic upside down and ruin a day no matter what you do, I myself used to be severely depressed so I relate hard to “the Fog” as I call it and how it can make efforts to help you bounce off like spitballs.

  • Ratette (she/her)
    link
    fedilink
    202 years ago

    Yeah someone being abrasive and depressed doesn’t seem like a fair reason to ban them personally but i wont pretend to know the full story here.

    Yes the doomerism is difficult especially when we’ve all got shit and maintaining good mental health is hard enough but I feel like if they were here then they were already better than 99% of reddit ideologically and would it not be remiss of us to help iron out the misunderstandings of ML and landlords etc and offer a less judgemental ear to their negativity? I know people being patient with me is how I became the person I am today.

    I dunno, not sure I’d call this a “pro gamer move” but again I don’t know the details.

    • ☭CommieWolf☆
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      Ive been concerned about them for a while, imo a ban should only be leveled on someone who either is malicious in their intent, disrespectful and bigoted, or unapologetically anti-communist. This looks like a case of ignorance more than anything. This is the sort of ban I’d expect on Reddit, not here.

      • Ratette (she/her)
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        I think more effort should have be made to help and uplift comrades in these situations. I can appreciate how abrasive they were and when people are trying to help that can get tiring quickly especially when everyone’s got their own problems but still it doesn’t feel right to 86 someone who clearly isn’t in a good place.

        • KiG V2OP
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          I think for those tired out with it the M.O. should be simply to ignore it. Let those with less arduous days who still have some mental and emotional energy to spare take care of it. I also know that negativity is exhausting but how rewarding it can be to help someone up, and that it takes repetitive hard work.

      • KiG V2OP
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Yeah, maybe some sort of temporary ban type deal or “time out” (something less infantilizing sounding of course) if someone is being particularly belligerent, a way to take 5 and step away and clear one’s head of need be, I think such a thing could definitely have its uses.

    • KiG V2OP
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Yes I’m totally open to simply not knowing the full story.

      And yes exactly, I know it was also through kindness patience good reasoning and good presentation that I am now epic Dengist POS wumao scheduled to commit suicide by 20 bullets to the back of the head.

      • Ratette (she/her)
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Yeah sometimes knowing someone’s story can help other empathise but I’d like to be able to not need that context to be invested in someone’s wellbeing.

        I’m still waiting on my goddamn Xi bucks 😤😤😤

  • Leslie(she/her)
    link
    fedilink
    192 years ago

    The mod who banned them is a reddit mod who wasn’t actively moderating this sub until recently. I think they reacted to the landlord comment in isolation without checking their post history. Should unban them asap imo.

  • BrezhnevsEyebrows
    link
    fedilink
    142 years ago

    The reason given in the modlog is “landlord apologist” so I dont think you missed anything

  • Soviet Snake
    link
    fedilink
    122 years ago

    I dont know what happened but I think I agree with you, would be nice some context.

  • immoral_hedge
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Eesh, i look at this when it happened. I dont think he is discussing in bad faith but genuinely confused as by why we wanted to ‘genocide’ all landlords.

    Owning a flat to rent out is in some places pretty common, how it goes is something like this; often the parents will help their son/daughter to buy their first flat, because they cant on their own. Ex. To low income as students etc. The young will pay down the loan trough their parents, as to not just ‘waste’ it on normal rent.

    When the flat is owned and the young student is ready for marriage/job they dont sell it, they move to a another place with their family and rent out the student flat to help pay down their new mortgage. When i was i school, several students had this or very similar things happen to them and tbh, i dont see them as evil. They are indeed blindly following traditions/taking goverment incentives to promote self ownership and to become financially independent from their parents.

    • lemmygrabber
      link
      fedilink
      212 years ago

      The problem with citing these mom and pop landords is that they are a tiny minority in the land holding class and are used as a technicality to derail the conversation.

      Obviously if someone says redact the landlords, it is not meant that literally every single person who has rented out land will be redacted.

      The mom and pop landlords are used to distract from that fact in most capitalist countries, the land distribution is highly unequitable and billions are made by a few by the way of renting out owned properties. Using one of these as an example to go to “most landowners are working class” is a giant leap in logic. Then it is topped off by a nihilistic “there is no ethical consumption under capitalism”.

      • @SaddamHussein24@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        122 years ago

        I mean there is no ethical consumption under capitalism tho.

        Which is why we need to hang the billionaires and politicians and build socialism instead.

      • immoral_hedge
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Thank you for a good reply. But, i dont agree with the premise that these types of landlords are such a minority that it can be ignored by calling them a «technicality to derail the conversation».

        I belive the ratio of how many rentals the general landowner own is corresponding with the general wealth. The higher the more rentals.

        What Zero said was

        I don’t think they should get the same treatment as a capitalist owning 965 houses from inheritance and the exploitation of workers

        And as yourself just said

        it is not meant that literally every single person who has rented out land will be redacted.

        Imo we are all agreeing that not all landowners should face the wall. It can be more nuanced than that and its important to explain these things. They certainly wont learn it in school.

        Maybe he is speaking from personal experiences when he said «most landowners are working class», maybe he is young. Anyway, in general its better to try to teach people, especially when they already show great interest for the same ideas as us.

        And lets be real; there is no ethical consumption under capitalism 😄

        • lemmygrabber
          link
          fedilink
          72 years ago

          The reason I brought “there is no ethical consumption under capitalism” is that one cannot just say that to justify anything willy nilly. It is one thing, for example, to drive to work in a car because the urban planning of a capitalist system compels you but it is something to own a property, charge someone a significant portion of their monthly income to allow them live in it, and evict them if they are unable to pay rent.

          • immoral_hedge
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I agree with mostly everything. The only thing i disagree with is, i think you are painting it very black and white. Not every landlord will «charge a significant portion of their monthly income to allow them live in it, and evict them if they are unable to pay rent.» and its necessary to be exact when talking about this. We dont want to be seen as merciless thugs.

            A landlord today can by defition include a single parent full of debt, working 2-3 minimum wage jobs for some billionare while ‘renting out’ a bedroom to her son and his girlfriend that they pay with some goverment program or student loan, to some billionare with hundreds of inherited rental properties. Its alot of people in between.

            • lemmygrabber
              link
              fedilink
              52 years ago

              You mean renting out a room in the home she lives in to her own son to get some grant from the government?

              • immoral_hedge
                link
                fedilink
                32 years ago

                Yes, as an example. If she owns the house, she can by definition also be her own sons landlord if he is over 18 and are eligible for some kind of grant/benefits.

                • lemmygrabber
                  link
                  fedilink
                  62 years ago

                  That’s not what anyone has in mind when they speak of landlord as a class.