lf (as in list files) is a modern alternative to ranger with significant improvements in terms of speed and reliability. This guide is intended to help users who are familiar with ranger to switch to lf more comfortably.

  • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    The main reason for me still using ranger over lf is the reasonable defaults. I want to be able to install the file manager on a new system without having to configure basics like creating directorys or deleting files.

    • talkingBirdOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The lfrc config in the linked repo is intended to fix that. Sure you still need to clone the config from github into your .config, but that is normally the case for quite a few tools.

    • talkingBirdOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would the file manager need to handle smb (mounting?) I always setup smb shares through fstab and have them automatically mounted, lf shows the files just fine.

      If you want a way to mount shares through your file manager, Im sure there is a way to add this to lfs config, but I don’t really understand why.

        • talkingBirdOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh in that case you may want to take a look at rclone. You can use that to configure profiles for separate shares it makes mounting and managing them very easy.