HBO Max was renamed Max, and Warner Bros. Discovery lost subscribers::Warner Bros. Discovery lost 1.8 million subscribers in the second quarter of 2023 following HBO Max’s rebrand to Max. The company now has 95.8 million subscribers across all of its services.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    265
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In all seriousness, why the hell would a company already branded the “Home Box Office” run away from the moniker in the era of at-home online movie binging. You have some of the most intuitive psychic real estate shy of Twitter, a company whose name will never be changed because the brand recognition is so high. Who could have possibly gotten you to believe changing it to something as vague and ill-suited as Max was a good idea?

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Still calling it HBO Max would have tainted the brand

        Is there an HBO left that isn’t Max? It isn’t as though I can stream the Good HBO sans the Bad reality tv crap.

        Which also tells you what they think of customers

        I get HBO through AT&T as a perk. I don’t subscribe to it independently. Its possible that someone at HBO noticed the bulk of their user base has some kind of arrangement like this and thinks just drawing down revenue from these default subscriptions is preferable to chasing new user sign-ups through attractive content and salesmanship.

      • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I sign into “max” now and get bombarded on the home screen with basic cable reality show trash, and every time that happens it just makes me want to use it less. The only thing keeping me coming back is the occasional Soderbergh project and an as-of-yet still decent catalogue of movies, though even that has dropped off noticeably.

        I would drop my subscription if it wasn’t bundled into my phone plan.

        • shenanigans4u@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Some of it is there but they’re taking the best of it and leasing it out to others streaming services with ads.

    • flossdaily@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not to mention all the happy nostalgia from their PRIMARY TARGET CUSTOMERS who were kids in the 80s and still fondly remember the HBO feature presentation intro.

    • Justice@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some moron just rebranded a logo worth who knows how many possible billions to… just X

      Some people are just fucking dumb as hell

      • Techmaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        He renamed a valuable trademark to a letter that he’ll never be able to trademark. It’s like when Intel tried to trademark the letter I.

    • TurboDiesel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right?! My first thought was “Max? You mean like Cinemax? Did Cinemax buy HBO??” Well, turns out, the OPPOSITE is true. In what world is Cinemax the more valuable brand than HBO???

      • eric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s the most baffling to me is that WB owned HBO and Cinemax when they created HBOMax, but they chose not to include Cinemax content.

        I guess these days among the executive class, it’s just really cool to purposefully mismanage your IP.

        • Techmaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s because they didn’t buy Cinemax to combine them into a bigger more valuable brand with more IP. They bought out Cinemax to eliminate the competition. And they did it around the same time that all the streaming services started taking off, so they obviously got their asses kicked by Netflix. Cable TV as a whole has really suffered since Netflix and Prime got really big.

    • Zap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because they want to bog it down with shitty titles (quantity vs quality) to appear more competitive with more programming and don’t want to degrade the HBO brand.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What brand is left after you’ve renamed the flagship service?

        Its not like HBO Premium is some extra tier of service.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry to repost. I immediately tossed in a thing about the rebrand and then saw this, so I’m hitting it again because it frames the rebrand as knowing and deliberate (as opposed to a fuck up).

      Bad Faith podcast had an episode on the strike a couple weeks back. The guests (strikers) talked about how Zaslav renaming HBO to Max is right inline with their intent to churn out “good enough” content to increase profits rather than increase quality. They likened it to a signal to Wall Street to improve their share value.

    • Duplodicus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      At the same time they made the name change they also eliminated a bunch of content and highlight a lot more of the reality stuff that might not have the same draw.

    • krayj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It comes across as if it was a business decision without regard for their customers…without the basic understanding that their customers ARE their business.

  • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had HBO in some form for 20 years, the many things they did to destroy HBO’s dna in the name of short term profit ended that loyalty.

    They shelved projects people worked on, that is their professional reputation, for a tax break.

    They cancelled series that legions of fans were invested in.

    The CEO even crowed about how great it will be to start generating cheap to produce “reality” show garbage instead of quality content.

    Insatiable, capitalistic greed just turns whatever it touches to shit. A race to the bottom.

    • TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      HBO was known for low volume but high quality content. I think Apple is trying to copy them (at exceedingly low volumes), but there is really no other service in that space.

      • Techmaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Disney+ is similar. Obviously they have the massive library of movies, but their TV shows have been fairly similar to Apple TV.

  • thessnake03@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t get why they made Max a completely different app. I mean I also don’t get dropping the hbo monicker, but why did I have to get a brand new app instead of them just reskining hbo max

    • Hoomod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair with that one, that’s purely Musk and his fascination with the letter X.

      When you’re one of (the?) richest people in the world, you get to do completely idiotic things and they never have any real negative impact on your life.

      • sigh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Musk and his fascination with the letter X.

        is the letter X really all that fascinating? I can think of a number of letters far more fascinating than X.

        Like what’s up with the letter W? Shits kinda crazy, just a bunch of lines and shit.

        Literally everyone and their mom is sleeping on the letter Z…

        Oh, and don’t even get me started on the letter O. Just think about that for a second. Is it one line? Or 0 lines? Or an infinite line? Circles are fucking crazy bro

        • phx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Given what’s going on in Ukraine and Russia I doubt many orgs want to use Z, although by that logic I’m surprised Elon didn’t pick it instead of X

  • Porcupine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    HBO = my brain thinks Game of Thrones, Sopranos, The Last of Us, Band of Brothers, Chernobyl. Literally decades and decades of quality premium content.

    MAX = porn. My brain immediately associates the name with porn. Idk why.

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me it’s because of Cinemax - ie Skinemax - which used to be associated with the softcore porn they’d play late at night.

      It always mystified me that HBO Max was even able to use that name since it was so evocative of another premium cable network.

  • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I swear that companies are really misunderstanding how most people interact with brands, or I am. But given recent events, I think it’s the companies. On another topic, for reasons I cannot fathom, Schwans home frozen food delivery is re-branding from Schwans’ (which is hard for me to spell, but easy to say) that it’s been since the 1950s and is widely understood and recognized. What are they re-branding to? It sounds like they got right up to date with mid 90s Internet company branding, going with Yelloh! (I think). No one wants to say Yelloh!. It looks stupid, and somehow more out of fashion than their old logo.

    We’ve got whatever the heck is going on with Twitter/X, we’ve got this (Yea, no one recognizes HBO, that’s OLD./s) The Great Courses Plus renamed Wondrium (which is again, giving up a rather well known brand in some niches with an obvious idea that it’s slightly different as a subscription). At least this doesn’t entirely sound / look stupid, and they added content when doing it, but still.

    I probably could go on, but just… why? IDK - have you ever looked at an existing brand and thought - oh, that’s too dated? Usually companies pull this stuff to “trick” people into thinking it’s a different company, like when Blackwater became whatever, or Jeep etc became Stellantis. Such self owns.

  • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s pretty ironic how companies will spend so much money on advertising to gain brand recognition, but then throw it away on a whim.

    • neutron@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I imagine executive meetings with people rambling about (an already well established) brand cannibalizing (what could become, if everything goes perfectly, an equally or even more recognized) brand. Basically, throwing away what you have for what you could have in the future.

    • Techmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s just like spending, what was it, 44 billion dollars or something like that to own Twitter, and not even a year later you drop the brand and rename it X. Like, dude, any decent programmer or sysadmin could spin up a copy of Twitter in a few days of work. You paid $44 billion for the brand.

      • Drusenija@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        44 billion for the brand, but more importantly the user base. Although let’s not discount the tech behind the scenes. Any decent programmer or sysadmin might be able to spin up a copy of Twitter in a few days. But it’s not going to scale to the size Twitter is, and have all the moderation and legal tools Twitter does (although Elon is gutting those by the day), integrate into as many places as Twitter does, have the app infrastructure Twitter does, etc.

        But regardless, all those things are irrelevant without people actually using the service. No clone is going to have the user base, and even with the rebrand to X, Elon still has a lot of users. Not as many as when he started, but still a lot. That’s what the 44 billion bought.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    During an earnings call, the company’s chief financial officer, Gunnar Wiedenfels, attributed the downward trend to “overlapping subscriber bases between Max and Discovery Plus” as well as “expected churn” following the end of The Last of Us season 1 and the series finale of Succession.

    CEO David Zaslav had something similar to say, noting that “while we have seen some expected subscriber disruption, we have experienced lower than expected churn throughout this process” — a process that involved asking HBO Max subscribers to download a new Max app to their devices in order to continue using the service.

    Zaslav has previously hinted at incorporating news and sports into Max, and rumors suggest that it could add live CNN broadcasts to the platform.

    As Hollywood producers as well as writers and actors butt heads over the use of AI and streaming residuals, Zaslav said it’s “important” that the strike gets settled soon.

    “We’re hopeful that all sides will get back to the negotiating rooms so that the strikes get resolved in a way that the writers and actors feel they are fairly compensated and their efforts and contributions are fully valued.”

    The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers and Writers Guild of America are set to have their first meeting since the strike began on Friday.


    I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • KluEvo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      fuck up naming their pets or hell, their children

      I mean, you have heard about what Musk named/wanted to name his child, yes?

      • Misconduct@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Money makes people think they’re special which of course means they can’t have lowly common poor people names. To the absolute detriment of their kids. I would be livid if I got some of the stupid ass names these people are cursing their children with I stg

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It depends on the company. Most of the time it’s somebody in charge fancying a certain name for no reason whatsoever and everyone around them kissing their ass about how great it is.

      Sometimes it’s a little more organized and everybody at the table starts spit bowling names until somebody in charge goes yeah I like that and then they’re All falling over each other too gosh about how great it is.

      Smart places hire an overpriced PR firm who does market research and then listens to their advice.

      Years ago we started a new project. It was exactly the same as our existing project, but with a few minor new features and a fancy new four letter name. I wasn’t high enough on the totem pole to be included in the discussions about the project It just came to me to help do the work.

      Oh great name I guess what’s it stand for? Oh uhh nothing. We just made it up. Really? It sounds like it should be a bird or something. Nope we looked it up It doesn’t have any meaning.

      A few weeks later I’m driving into work a different way than I normally take and there’s a smoke stack with the damn four letter name on the side of it. They named the new product after a local company who probably named themselves after someone’s last name.

      For the next couple of years every time anyone asked about the product the very first thing they asked is where the name came from. Yeah I don’t know, they just made some s*** up.

  • coys25@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree that these changes have all been incredibly stupid and devalue one of the few remaining producers of quality TV (HBO), but I think that this is missing the point. The key is this:

    Notably, the loss in subscribers didn’t seem to affect streaming revenue. It grew to $2.73 billion this quarter, marking a 13 percent increase.

    In other words, fill up the service with cheap / easy to produce reality crap and hike up prices over time. Revenue goes up and costs go way down. People drift away but you keep growing the bottom line, at least for now. The shareholders rejoice and the consumers lose.

    • IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The menu configuration is nearing Amazon Prime levels of stupidity when they used to have one of the easiest to navigate.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right, the title implies it has something to do with the name change, which is silly. The reason Max has fewer subscribers than HBO did is that HBO was objectively better than Max is.

    • Misconduct@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also saw a lot of posts from people that just had issues even getting logged in or with opening the app itself. Honestly it’s embarrassing for such a large company to look so incompetent.

  • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I want to pay for max so I can watch warrior season 3 and let their BS algorithm know there’s interest in it and not cancel it outright. They don’t even allow subscribers from my country UK so I have no choice but to pirate. They also have not released the season 2 bluray yet and I’m not gonna get the season 1 one if I’m just gonna end up with an incomplete collection cause this company is just allergic to taking my money.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bad Faith podcast had an episode on the strike a couple weeks back. The guests (strikers) talked about how Zaslav renaming HBO to Max is right inline with their intent to churn out “good enough” content to increase profits rather than increase quality. They likened it to a signal to Wall Street to improve their share value.

  • Bananajon2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You literally cannot change the fucking size of the subtitles anymore, at least on Android or Chromecast. So you’re stuck with giant letters, black background. It’s the most infuriating shit of all time, HBO Max had options to change these things, I can’t believe that 1 programmer couldn’t solve this in a single day.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like Netflix is the only one with a sensible default subtitle size.

      Everyone else is like “Oh, you need subtitles. ARE YOU DEAF? IF WE MAKE THE LETTERS EXTRA BIG WILL YOU HEAR THEM BETTER!”

      No motherfucker, I just need them because modern audio mixing is a fucking mess and actors have started mumbling. This is what happens when all the stage actors retire or die. I never had trouble understanding Alan Rickman or Tim Curry. They didn’t need subtitles. But them you get Matthew McConaughey, and he’s all “mmmhmmhm Murph” even without the spaceship engine noises, like even his fucking name is mumbled. Fuck you.

      • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t help that TVs don’t include decent speakers anymore. A soundbar is a minimum, although I’ve seen those start to cheap out on the speakers too. Poor audio quality makes humans less understandable.

  • WontonSoup
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was a subscriber and there was no smooth move over to max. I had to keep resetting my password every time I logged in and then eventually couldn’t get into either site even moments after a reset. Eventually said fuck it and cancelled.

    If it’s anything more than barely inconvenient to use your service I’ll spend my money elsewhere

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Having to configure settings all over again on every single device pissed me off, especially since the new app didn’t even have subtitles customization of any kind. As someone who uses subtitles for almost all viewing, nothing turns me off of a streaming service faster than being stuck with shitty black bars and gigantic blocky text by default and being unable to change it.

      And for fuck’s sake, nobody likes video previews with sound, and you can take your credit-skipping autoplay and shove it up your corporate ass.