• Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s illegal, you are guaranteed at least two weeks of (unpaid) medical leave whether yoou’re the King or a city street sweeper.

      • Luccus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m still amazed that people just accept this.

        What happens, if you are ill for a longer? You can’t just work ethic an illness away.

        And it’s also stupid from the company’s perspective. If someone has the flu and you have them come in - well - everyone will be sick and everyones performance will suffer.

        Who thought this is acceptable, let alone a good idea?

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          And it’s also stupid from the company’s perspective. If someone has the flu and you have them come in - well - everyone will be sick and everyones performance will suffer.

          You underestimate capitalism

  • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    You can’t accept me using the time I’ve earned? Should I get approval for how I spend my paycheck too?

    It wasn’t a request, I was letting you know so you can plan. See you when I get back.

  • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    206
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The US is wild.

    You call yourselves the land of the free, but have to beg your boss to let you have time off that’s owed.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      4 days ago

      Freedom is when nazis can freely beat you on the street and cops do nothing. FREEDOM, BABY! 🦅🇺🇸

      (Fun fact, I got arrested when I defended myself against a bully in school, ACAB)

    • Donkter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      81
      ·
      4 days ago

      To be fair, having the government mandate how much time you get off for working 40 hours a week is kind of just codifying the indentured servitude you’re under.

      • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Wow. I’ve seen some shit takes around here, but that one is just outta pocket, you’re gonna have to explain that one

        • Donkter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          To be fair, I’m not defending having to beg your boss for time off.

          In our world we have a simple choice: work for whoever will hire you, or starve and die on the streets. Barring random and uncontrollable acts of charity or the extremely fortunate situation in which you work for yourself.

          Now we could go back and forth on where on the spectrum of “you would be working all day miserably farming if it weren’t for your job” and “you should feel blessed to die of black lung in the coal mines cause at least you got to work” we both lie. But, in a society where the majority of work involves “work or die”, our promises to our bosses are very short periods of indentured servitude in a very hyperbolic sense.

          Sure, you can quit at any time only to find another job or be taken to jail (we could go into the criminalization of homelessness), but for most people, you’re working for life.

          So to say that the government (or employment contract) mandating that you’re owed days of vacation is an expression of freedom is a far cry from my definition of freedom and to me seems only to entrench our status quo by throwing breadcrumbs to us to stop us from getting too agitated.

          I was certainly being glib and hyperbolic tho

        • CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          On the same take, we used to get 15min breaks every 2 or 3 hours. Then the government wrote laws that said we had to get at least 10min breaks every 4 hours. So now we get less because you will only ever get the minimum.

          We get less breaks and they have to be shorter than what the average was before.

          I’m not against labor laws, but I’ve been working nearly four decades now and I’m still getting bent over every opportunity.

      • Rooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        4 days ago

        Watch out guys, we have a Temporarily Embarrased Billionare™ in the comment section.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        4 days ago

        What are you talking about? If the government didn’t require paid leave, you might get … none of it! So the mandate actually makes you … checks notes … less controlled.

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        That’s only the minimum of paid time off though, and how many hours of a week you work is determined between you and your employer in the form of a contract. If you think that this is indentured servitude, to the state which provides you with taxes and services, then I really don’t know on which planet and or reality you live in.

  • almost1337@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    150
    ·
    4 days ago

    I still remember putting in vacation at my first job, three months in advance and they still said “well it’s your job to make sure your shifts are covered”. Fuck you, Karen, you make the damn schedule one month at a time, just don’t put me on it that week.

    • Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      4 days ago

      The shirking of responsibility gets me every time cause like if the manager doesent do that then what DO they do?

      • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        4 days ago

        Seriously. You aren’t really managing your employees if they have to organize resource shortages for you. At my job, I tell my colleagues to just take time off and, like me, list a few close co-workers as people to contact in case of emergencies in their OOO reply. Nothing is life-or-death, so people can deal with waiting. It’s not like anyone is taking off months straight.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s rediculous how retail jobs put you through the ringer if you dare to try to stay home while too sick to work (and basically punish you for doing the right thing and calling to notify them you won’t be in and why) but then you get into a professional job and you can sometimes simply not show up and tell nobody and be fine

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Should have replied “it is your obligation to give me HR paycheck”

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      If it’s the employees job to manage themselves, then they should all be promoted to manager.

      Drag isn’t joking. Drag has worked at a company where things were done like that. It wasn’t perfect but it was better than the American model.

            • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              4 days ago

              Conjugation depends on the individual pronoun, not on the grammatical structure. English isn’t Latin. A lot of people complained about singular they/them because of the conjugation, but we moved past that misunderstanding a decade ago.

              • hdnsmbt@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                19
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                If conjugation depends on the individual pronoun, the pronoun you used was third person since that’s the conjugation you used. They/them is also third person and singular and plural are conjugated the same, so the comparison doesn’t apply.

                To be clear, please use any and all pronouns you’re comfortable with. But don’t write a third person sentence and insist it’s first person.

                • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  19
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Conjugation doesn’t depend on the grammatical structure. Not directly, and not through the pronoun. Drag will prove it: they/them and you/you use the same conjugation, but are in different persons. You don’t think “they” is a second person pronoun, do you?

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Question 4 drag

            If drag had access to BoringNormie Pills, would drag take them?

            (Assume they would permanently or temporarily reset identity to a highly common one)

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yeah, there was a big boss we all answered to. He just trusted us to manage ourselves instead of dedicating any employees to management. We had HR and Payroll, but they didn’t tell us what to do.

          Drag is lead to understand Valve uses a similar structure.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        How many coworkers beat the shit out of you for trying to make them call you “drag”?

      • spirinolas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Drag doesn’t really fit you. Let’s try something else. How about…Coco?! Yeah you seem like a Coco. Anyone else agree?

  • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 days ago

    Funny story, my wife told her boss she needed time off for our honeymoon as we drove to our wedding. She got it, but they teased her about it for a month.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    In Japan, by law it is a declaration. You use paid leave, you do not ask to use it.

  • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Back when I worked a shitty retail job we would usually hire a few people on fixed term/fixed hours over the Christmas/New Year peak (ie, you get minimum 20 hours a week for 16 weeks starting November 1st), first couple of weeks are mostly training, then peak, then cover into the new year while the full time people take some leave.

    Had one guy who got to the end of his training then informed management that he would need leave approved starting now and right through peak because his family was going to an expensive ski resort but that he’d happily pick up some more hours when he got back. Got really salty when he was told that that wasn’t going to happen, and he was welcome to go anyway but shouldn’t expect a job when he got back.

  • ohellidk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Been in this position before - fuck your job and live your life. If they were such dicks about it then do you REALLY wanna work there anyways?

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t understand this.

    I have Canada and USA coworkers and when they ask for time off approval, they usually get it according to a per team schedule.

    We know what quarters are going to be the busiest before hand so everyone is encouraged to take time off when it is less demanding.

    You can also take time off in busiest times.

    In both cases, you are asked to request anyone from your team to backup you up (obviously available when you are not)

    • WalnutLum
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think many people (me included) feel that it shouldn’t be the employee’s responsibility to find shift coverage.

      • Ohbs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Agreed. It would make sense to me if managing schedules was a job for the manager.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Are you paid to do scheduling? What if coworkers say no? … Those are two serious potential problems.

      • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I would default to assuming that this is a professional job, so making sure you’re covered in case something goes wrong is expected and also reasonable to expect from coworkers. If there’s conflicts (I don’t think I can support this while you’re gone because I’m gonna be too busy with x), you go to your manager and ask them to figure it out. But by default, it’s likely you know who is best equipped to support because they are already working with you.

      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        No, nothing of the sorts.

        As part of the team we all know, usually, the details of the projects we are working on, details that we cannot expect a manager to follow or know for each project, because there are a lot of details and many projects. A lot of them overlap in discovery, development, execution and deployment and also have different priorities.

        And it is my understanding that managers also need to prioritize given sudden issues, emergency requests, and so on.

        Anyways, with that info, we can decide who is the best fit for it given the experience they have had or not with specific projects.

        Also it is usually not that hard.

        You don’t get a backup 2 days before your time off, indeed, more often than not, it is asked with a lot of anticipation.

        Also, most of the time when you go on time off, you are encouraged to have all of your projects deliverables ready for when you are out.

        That way, your teammates doing the backup are just checking in on the project and available for general questions.

        Personally, I like to leave documentation as well for my backups so they know what to expect. It’s not strange to have changes that imply more work for the backup so the extra context helps a lot.

        • orcrist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Right. If everyone is super supportive and there are never emergencies or vacation scheduling conflicts, this all works. And the rest of the time, you end up having to deal with bullshit that the bosses should be handling. And hey, if your workplace is magically different from most others, and nothing ever gets funky, great!

    • underwire212@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      My thoughts as well. “Lol go ahead and fire me? Either I’ll just take another wage slave job or realize that you really fucking need my labor. Either way, two scenarios I can risk myself being in”

      I also realize this is a very privileged position to have. Because I’m in such a position, I can be truer to my moral compass and values. Behaving in ways that enrich myself at the expense of others wellbeing would be extremely selfish since I can actually choose not to be selfish and still live a relatively privileged lifestyle.

      Just kind of wanting to let people know that even in the fairly upper echelons of social status, there are those who fucking hate the system. I’m economically satisfied, but I’m incredibly deprived of human experience and brotherhood.

      The few organizations and groups I’ve been in that had real class consciousness were the most alive and joyous I’ve ever felt, even though at the time I was dirt shit poor. I would give anything to go back to those times. And I am now realizing this wish of mine isn’t fantasy. Enough human courage and anything is possible.

      Edit:

      So my comment was meant to be a shared experience of struggle that others could hopefully relate to in solidarity. Not an opinion or argument. That may not have been clear from my comment.

      There’s nothing privileged about quitting a job.

      I would 100% disagree with your statement here. There absolutely is privilege in being able to quit a job for some other argument than “I fucking need the money to feed my family this week”

      Maybe you have never been in such a situation? I have, and I’ll tell you that it fucking sucks. Having to choose between moral values you hold very close to heart and risking not having a paycheck to care for a number of dependents is not a decision that any person should be forced to make.

      The rest of your comment follows from the assumption of a misunderstood conclusion of mine, so I will stop here. Don’t mind clarifying anything though.

      Edit 2: Also, what does “muting thread” mean? Is that “adult speak” for “I don’t wanna talk to you anymore”?

        • underwire212@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          So my comment was meant to be a shared experience of struggle that others could hopefully relate to in solidarity. Not an opinion or argument. That may not have been clear from my comment.

          There’s nothing privileged about quitting a job.

          I would 100% disagree with your statement here. There absolutely is privilege in being able to quit a job for some other reason than “I fucking need the money to feed my family this week”

          Maybe you have never been in such a situation? I have, and I’ll tell you that it fucking sucks. Having to choose between moral values you hold very close to heart and risking not having a paycheck to care for a number of dependents is not a decision that any person should be forced to make.

          The rest of your comment follows from the assumption of a misunderstood motive of mine, so I will stop here. Don’t mind clarifying anything though.

          Edit: Also, what does “muting thread” mean? Is that “adult speak” for “I don’t wanna talk to you anymore”?