• @OsrsNeedsF2P
    link
    9
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    What a total joke, but there was also hints they would do it given their non-answer back on March 2nd.

    This is also a reverse of what they did in 2014, where they censored content from Russian users by the Russian government request. Totally unpredictable beyond making the wrong move each time.

    Also keep in mind Github is owned by Microsoft, who have always been scum to open source.

    • DessalinesA
      link
      72 years ago

      Warning: they are Germany-based, and not friendly to anything piracy-related. They removed a few repos of mine, and I had to move elsewhere.

      • Arthur BesseA
        link
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Repos of something other than FOSS, or repos of potentially-infringement-enabling FOSS like youtube-dl? From what I know of codeberg I’d expect them to allow the latter; I hope they aren’t any more unfriendly to piracy-related FOSS than their local laws require them to be.

        • DessalinesA
          link
          52 years ago

          I think its a local law issue, but also Germany’s laws against piracy / infringement are almost as draconian as the US’s.

      • dinomug
        link
        32 years ago

        Really? Just when a thought that compared to Github and Gitlab it was the best alternative for not being a corporation and being less tied (in legal/political terms) to any kind of US constraints. What where the supposed reasons for the banning?

    • @OsrsNeedsF2P
      link
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Trying a few ideas


      “Self Reflection Time”

      I don’t like this one too much since it criticizes the audience


      “Github Issues Today Explained”

      I don’t like this one too much because I don’t actually know SQL or what the proper expression would be


      Thoughts/others?

      • @Metallinatus
        link
        42 years ago

        “Thanks GitHub, very cool”

        Feel free to post it there if you want.

        • @OsrsNeedsF2P
          link
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          That’s super good, will post a toned down variation of it

      • Ephera
        link
        22 years ago

        Not being all too fluent in SQL, I was wondering why that statement looked so weird… :D

        I believe, it would rather be e.g.:

        DELETE FROM users
        WHERE country = "Russia";
        

        Maybe a bit too obvious to be particularly funny, but at the same time I don’t have a ton of faith in the SQL abilities of /r/ProgrammerHumor…

  • @projjalm
    link
    3
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

  • @kevincox
    link
    32 years ago

    Made worse by the fact that GitHub minimized the actual Git metadata as much as possible. For example the linked commit has just a one-line description and a number. If GitHub encouraged good commit descriptions and history it would be much less of an issue.

    Of course they want the lock-in.

    • @OsrsNeedsF2P
      link
      22 years ago

      They did it for the UI/UX, which I actually agree with. The other mainstream git solutions are deplorable

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      -12 years ago

      I’m a big fan, the founded made an excellent post discussing how GitHub keeps introducing vendor lock in “features” like pull requests that don’t use standard git features and prevent collaboration with projects hosted on other platforms.

  • @iam0day
    link
    1
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    deleted by creator