• Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Remember, Pelosi has a net worth over $200mil.

    “It’s a big club, and she’s in it.”

    Pelosi fucking sucks. AOC for pres.

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      28 minutes ago

      https://apnews.com/article/business-nancy-pelosi-congress-8685e82eb6d6e5b42413417f3d5d6775

      We have no left party in the United States, merely an economically right-wing party to the left of a fascist party, with a few left-wing spoilers like AOC and Sanders that they despise far more than their fascist opposition party, because while Democrats and Republicans rage over social policy, often the symptoms of economic desperation, they drink from the same Wall Street gravy train and take the same orders on economic policy.

      A party actually attempting to reorient our economy based on the needs and priorities of the citizens of our society would be catastrophic to their legalized bribery, and insider info feeding arrangement.

      If you think either party under it’s current form will EVER lead to any form of universal healthcare, you’re deluding yourself.

      The UK has had universal healthcare since 1948. Canada since 1968-1970(provinces rollout)

      • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Hey, here’s a thought. You know about the guy that shot a parasite in NY? AOC could try that too. She’d need enough vocal (and armed) popular support to avoid conviction (and retaliatory assassination) and it might turn into a civil war, but it might also work.

    • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      12 hours ago

      none of the contemporary democrats have experience fighting fascists.

      usually because they don’t recognize their financial advisors as being fascists

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    “I’m probably going to die before my term is over, but I need to ratfuck the next generation of politicians so fascists get even more chance at fucking over more Americans.”

    Might as well just vote yes on everything Trump says, Pelosi.

  • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    171
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    this is why democrats will keep on losing. Aggressive campaigning against progressives. That’s how they tanked Berny who had a real shot at trump at the time. They have mothballed trump indictments when they’ve had a chance to impeach him, they have gagged them this campaign and result is for everyone to see… Pelosi is a very mean and very capable machine of destryction when it comes to progressives and their ideas

  • WatDabney@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    No surprise there.

    Establishment Democrats would rather have power held by Republicans than by progressive Democrats.

    • nothingcorporate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      11 hours ago

      And AOC has been kowtowing to Pelosi for the last few years in hopes of going along to get along. Hopefully this will wake up progressive Democrats to realize they will never be accepted by corporate Democrats, no matter how much they move to the right to appease them.

    • AugustWest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I wish people would stop saying this. She would lose. I like her, but that doesn’t change the fact that she is not going to be president.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Why would she lose?

        The normies would project whatever fantasy they want onto her, and she’s hot so it could be positive delusions.

        • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          46 minutes ago

          She’s also brown, a liberal, and from New York. Even if she had the cure for cancer White America would rather crucify themselves than let her become president.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            34 minutes ago

            See, this is why I don’t buy the “Harris lost because she’s a woman of color” crap. Centrists don’t want to admit that moving to the right has hit a wall, and it has the added bonus of being an excuse to shut out AOC.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I’m not them and I’d happily campaign my ass off for AOC, but I expect Whitmer. Who I’d take over the likes of Shapiro or Newsom any day.

      • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 hours ago

        She’s a real feisty one who’s only willing to go so far into being “corporate.” With the inevitable loss of Bernie, she will become the most recognized face of progressives in Congress. Her sharp tongue and wit, combined with an excellent ability to get her points made succinctly would serve her well in any attempt to run. She’s more lively and personable than Harris ever was.

        I’d say she has an excellent shot at the White House if she so chooses.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That’s what they would have said about Obama in 2004 if anyone knew his name back then…

        AOC could, should, and hopefully will run

        • AugustWest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 minutes ago

          This was practically a different country in 2004/2008 and let’s not pretend Obama and AOC are close on the political spectrum.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Fuck everything about Pelosi and her bullshit insider trading.

    She’s not there to help Americans, she’s there to maximize her and her husbands investments.

    “Blue no matter who” winds up like ghouls like this running the party, because they’ll never give up personal.power, and corrupt enough to sell out for campaign donations.

    We have to have more standard than the letter by a name.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      31 minutes ago

      There is no realistic third party option in the US. The way the right solves this is by primarying out the centrists in favour of people more aligned with their views. Even before Trump there was the Tea Party takeover. I suspect this is the most viable path forward for US leftists too. If Pelosi had her way AOC wouldn’t even have a seat, so there’s proof enough there that the plan can work.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I don’t know much about her, but what little I do know, she’s the Democrat’s version of McConnell.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Nope, McTurtle got rich along the way. But his lifelong goal has been packing the courts.

        He is literally salivating like he just walked into a salad bar at the 42 vacancies Biden is about to hand over.

        Pelosi doesn’t give a shit about the Dem platform or helping people. She wants America to stay in the early 90s, that used to be enough to be considered somewhat progressive.

        But the early 90s were 30 years ago. Imagine calling someone in the early 90s progressive because they wanted America to go back to pre civil rights movement.

        That’s the same time frame.

        The right move was forming a serious left third party decades ago. We’d have a right, center, and left party and nothing would get done without some compromise between the wings, likely leading to a more fluid party structure.

        We’d never see this shit where a handful of republican extremists sabotage everything no matter who has the majority.

        • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Nope, McTurtle got rich along the way. But his lifelong goal has been packing the courts.

          He is literally salivating like he just walked into a salad bar at the 42 vacancies Biden is about to hand over.

          Moscow Mitch is a politician, and a good one (in the sense of “good at manipulating political affairs”, not “a good person”). He’s a canny cunt, and that’s the most dangerous enemy you could come up with: one that knows what they’re doing.

        • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          No, a third party is non viable. But the right move would have been exactly what the crazy right wingers have done with the Republicans. Get organized and primary the fuck out of the people blocking things.

          The “tea party” gave us the blueprint, but we’ve been too dumb and lazy to follow it. When they didn’t give us the public option with Obamacare, every primary since then should have been about cleaning house of the corporatist, establishment Democrats and replacing them with real progressives. But since we’re too lazy and dumb to vote in primaries in mass numbers, their establishment people keep sailing to victory.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Get organized and primary the fuck out of the people blocking things.

            You’re ignoring primaries are rigged, the party can just ignore the results, and pro-corpo candidates take in an insane amount of bribes.

  • Gerudo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    You know she’s a great candidate for the people when her own party leaders don’t want her in power.

      • Gerudo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        Yet they quickly jumped on board and never took a stand against him. They are lock step now, so just because he didn’t get a warm welcome, they sure do love him now.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        And the Democratic establishment fucking LOVED Clinton and still do. She lost to Trump. Your logic is perfectly sound if you just want to lose.

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Funny that lemmy.world keeps whining about .ml types trying to get people not to vote when these fucking neoliberal ghouls are a better argument against it than anything they could ever say.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I vote Democrat because the other option is a Fascist, Democrats do this shit like breathing and it only makes me hate filling the bubble of “Not the open fascist party” party.

      • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’ve always wanted to ask how nice that sheriff was. I’ve read that he let you take visitors in his office and whatnot.

    • AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I mean… Yes. They are less evil. Way less evil. It’s not even close.

      Pelosi is a giant piece of shit, but she doesn’t make the top 75% of conservatives.

      Also AOC is a goddamn gem. Conservatives have previously zero of those.

      Are Democrats anywhere near where I want to be? No. But I can’t see how anyone could say they’re the same.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        There is a seemingly, almost intentional obtuseness to internal criticisms of the DNC from folks on the part of Democrats.

        Fundamental to why the right has been able to organize a fascist takeover of this nation is actions like this from the Democratic party. Fascism in this country wouldn’t be ascendant if the DNC didn’t rat-fuck Bernie, twice. Health care CEO’s wouldn’t be getting gunned down in the street if the DNC forced M4A instead of the corporate sellout of Obamacare in 2016. Trump would not have won if Democrats had focused their efforts and spent their political capitol on issues that would make a fundamental difference in peoples lived experience in the period of 2021-2024. We wouldn’t be in this position if Democrats didn’t slow walk the prosecution of Donald Trump, effectively sitting on their hands until an election year to start taking action.

        The state of this country is a direct consequence of the managerial class politics, which is all that the DNC has come to represent in a post 2024 world. They enable and empower the ratchet effect that allows the rightwing to become more and more fascist, because they are only ever willing to be a lessor evil.

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      She’s not even the leader anymore (that’s Hakeem Jeffries) she’s doing this just because she’s a ghoul.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I mean, she no longer holds the title of House Speaker, but the idea that Jeffries is the leader is a joke. After Harris lost, NYT was interviewing Pelosi, not Jeffries. She didn’t let Jeffries take over because she was abdicating power; she was deflecting criticism.

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Oh, Pelosi bad…

    Ever stop to think that she may owe political favor to AOC’s competitor? The democrats hold elections for chairs, and there is lots of this.

    Nevermind…

    Pelosi bad…

    • SeriousMite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Kind of irrelevant what her reasoning is. It’s a bad and stupid move politically. People are frustrated with the dems and are disengaging. They need change in leadership if they want to remain relevant. Pelosi and her ilk are out of touch and will run the country into the ground if they don’t step aside.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 minutes ago

        AOCs competitor is very well liked, even by AOC, and the caucus is roughly cut in half. It’s a vote, let’s see what happens. Pelosi gave up the leader role, but that doesn’t mean every chair is up for grabs.