Gee, who didn’t see that coming a million miles away.

    • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Now he’s just going to point and whine that he should be able to because Biden pardoned Hunter. I mean, I agree that he was going to at least try anyway, but this just allows him and his followers to use the “both sides” argument

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Eh, I doubt anyone who wasn’t already going to agree with him will be swayed by the" both sides". We should probably stop caring what arguments they’re going to use about stuff, no one’s on that side because of arguments.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 days ago

          Unfortunately, the “liberal media” often give them a big assist with the “both sides” thing, but, yeah, point taken. People need to stop caring what the Enlightened Centrists ™ and the wingers are going to say.

  • Gerudo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    10 days ago

    Lol a pardon doesn’t work for anyone but the pardoned person. Why is this even an argument?

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 days ago

    You get out of jail free? Then me too me too, memememememememememe!

    Wonder what the 2 million other prisoners are thinking now

    • Leeks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 days ago

      Probably not. The Hush Money case is a state case, not a federal case. Presidential pardons (up till this point) are only valid for federal crimes.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 days ago

      Doesnt matter. The case is dead. By the time he is out of office, he’d be too old.

      He was never going to prison to begin with, even if Kamala won. Some lawyer is gonna argue its unsafe for a former president to be in prison and supreme court would side with the trump lawyer, so he’d at worst, be in house arrest for like maybe a few months.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Putting aside the specific matter of jurisdiction (state level cases require state level pardons), legal experts widely agree that the concept of a self-pardon does not exist in pretty much any body of law, ever, because it basically refutes the idea of there being a body of law.

      But, given that the supreme court decided that the president is a god-king emperor, the fact that he can’t legally do it no longer really matters.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        because it basically refutes the idea of there being a body of law

        So does money being the same as speech. So does presidential immunity.

        There seems to be a pattern here.

      • MyNameIsRichard
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        But, given that the supreme court decided that the president is a god-king emperor, the fact that he can’t legally do it no longer really matters.

        That’s what I was wondering about

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 days ago

          The answer, as I understand it, is basically “Who the fuck knows?”

          Every serious legal analyst seems to agree that the SC’s immunity decision is, uh… I think the technical term is “Total fucking lunacy.” It makes no sense, destroys a lot of existing legal precedent, and generally overturns many of the foundational principles of the US constitution. It’s batshit crazy, and the actual terms of the immunity and how it’s defined are astonishingly vague.

          What the president can or cannot do right now is more or less “???”

    • Kalkaline @leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Trump accepting the pardon from himself means he’s guilty but gets no consequences, sort of maintaining the status quo.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Trump accepting the pardon from himself means he’s guilty

        Accepting a pardon does not require an admission of guilt. That’s a myth. There is no part of the pardon process where you are required to admit guilt

        In fact, pardons have been issued because the pardoning authority determined that a person has been wrongly convicted. And at the federal level, general pardons have also been issued. In the case of a general pardon, if you accept one, what are you pleading guilty to? Every possible potential crime covered by the pardon?

        Garland was dicta. It was also bullshit.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    He’s convicted but not charged, does anyone really think it’ll be bad politically to just pardon himself? Is sycophants don’t care and clearly don’t have memories past 4 years.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Trump doesn’t care how anything looks. He loves to violate laws and civilized norms of behavior, he thinks it makes him look strong.