Each community can appoint its own moderators and make its own separate decisions about what sort of content is allowed, but we should also likely think about an instance wide way of determining what sorts of content are and are not allowed and how moderation decisions are made. It’s not a problem yet, but I figure it can’t hurt to go ahead and get feedback from the community about what sorts of communities have good or bad moderation practices that we can emulate. What do others think?

  • @pep@community.xmpp.net
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    Having a baseline document to refer to is definitely something I’d be in favour of. There are many examples of CoCs around that we can reuse/adapt to our use-case :)

    • @poVoq
      link
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • @pep@community.xmpp.net
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        One thing I like very much about this is the links below the short block of text to whoever can act on this. While we find out what we’re gonna put as CoC, we should probably work out who can do anything about it. Admins? a specific team? appointed by who? who can replace them? Can they dismiss any admins? etc.