• BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Hey, Laura. Fuck you. Fuck your profits and your corporate greed. Enshit yourself till you close down.

  • LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Frankly, I’m surprised it took them so long to say this publicly. For over a year, Mozilla has had a de facto conflict of interest when it came to their stance on advertisements, so take anything they say about their necessity with a huge grain of salt…

    May 2023: Mozilla purchases FakeSpot, a company that sells private data to advertisers. Mozilla keeps selling private data to advertisers to this day.

    June 2024: Mozilla purchases Anonym, an AdTech company.

  • Lemmchen@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 hours ago

    But taking on controversial topics because we believe they make the internet better for all of us is a key feature of Mozilla’s history.

    Is it?

    I would rather have a world where Mozilla is actively engaged in creating positive solutions for hard problems, than one where we only critique from the sidelines.

    Maybe your users don’t.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Not everyone?

    Does anyone?

    Good thing we can fork, I guess, but it’s kinda sad to watch a previously good org die

    • rhabarba@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      So is NetSurf, and has been for most of this century already. I mean, it’s great to see people even caring about independent browsers, but NetSurf surely needs much more love (and more developers). :-)

  • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    She went on to work at eBay for 13 years, followed by PayPal, Skype, and Airbnb. source

    why would Mozilla choose to be directed by an ebay+paypal+airbnb experience and can somebody with that background not think like this ☞

    “Because Mozilla’s mission is to build a better internet. And, for the foreseeable future at least, advertising is a key commercial engine of the internet, and the most efficient way to ensure the majority of content remains free and accessible to as many people as possible.”

    • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      21 minutes ago

      Advertising will not improve unless we address the underlying data sharing issues, and solve for the economic incentives that rely on that data.

      thanks to Mozilla for assuming the responsibility of improving advertising

      We can’t just ignore online advertising — it’s a major driver of how the internet works and is funded. We need to stare it straight in the eyes and try to fix it. For those reasons, Mozilla has become more active in online advertising over the past few years. - MARK SURMAN, PRESIDENT, MOZILLA source

      if we stay with that metaphor of “We need to stare it straight in the eyes and try to fix it”, it’s not difficult to imagine Mark and Mozilla being swallowed by the monster he’s “staring straight in the eyes” :/

      i hope they can filter the shit Mozilla will include in Firefox from mull and mullvad

  • Preston Maness ☭@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    41 minutes ago

    We know that not everyone in our community will embrace our entrance into this market. But taking on controversial topics because we believe they make the internet better for all of us is a key feature of Mozilla’s history. And that willingness to take on the hard things, even when not universally accepted, is exactly what the internet needs today.

    But you’re not doing the hard things. You’re doing the easy thing. Capitulation to surveillance capitalism is the easy thing.

  • ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    48 minutes ago

    In parallel to our existing consumer products, we have the opportunity to build a better infrastructure for the online advertising industry as a whole. Advertising at large cannot be improved unless the tech it’s built upon prioritizes securing user data. This is precisely why we acquired Anonym.

    Catering to the ad industry is backwards thinking, imo. Securing user data is easy enough if you do not collect it to begin with.

    Imo, the fact companies have changed the narrative in favor of advertisers and data collection, proves only profit matters, not the people.

  • heavy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 minutes ago

    What if we could have a world that wasn’t powered by ads? I’d like to get past this “only one way to run the internet” train of thought.

    I’m just so tired of ads, commercials and advertising in general. It’s exhausting.

  • fuck

    Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck

    But at least forking is still an option. The instant they make any moves that inhibit forking or privacy on forks, Firefox will be completely dead. For now, it’s just gangrenous.

    • rhabarba@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I wish that most forks wouldn’t be even worse. Pale Moon, the most interesting one, is a gang of patent trolls.