• YungOnions@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sure, but the original quote was:

    Everyone anywhere using one on the job should be fired

    There’s no nuance there it’s just AI = bad. I agree that it’s shouldn’t, in its current form, be used as a substitute for skill in important situations. You’re totally right there.

    • Don Piano@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I never said AI = bad. AI is much broader and contains worthwhile and non-plagiarized approaches.

      If it’s worth doing, do it properly.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        No you did say that.

        Everyone anywhere using one on the job should be fired

        You said anyone using an AI in any capacity should be fired. I have heard infinitely better takes from 4-year-olds and why they need more ice cream.

        • Don Piano@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is on a post about chatgpt use. Chatgpt is from the set of llms, which is a subset of ai.

          Ai is cool. The current batch of LLMs/PISS can leave.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            You want anybody using LLMs in any capacity to lose their livelihoods. That’s very much a “AI bad” take with zero nuance.