A Halifax-area man has had a slew of charges against him stayed after a judge concluded he was the subject of an illegal strip search by Halifax Regional Police.

Judge Alonzo Wright issued the stay in a ruling he delivered Wednesday in Halifax provincial court.

Dante Warnell Cromwell, 26, was facing more than 20 charges, including assault, drug trafficking and various firearms offences, stemming from an April 16, 2023, incident that Wright described as a case of “extreme road rage.”

“I remind myself that the burden here is on the Crown to show that there was reasonable and probable grounds to conduct the most intrusive and degrading search available to the police,” Wright said.

He raised a number of issues with the search, including the fact there were few notes kept by any of the officers, there were four officers present and the door to the room was left open.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    4 months ago

    As a result of that search, 41 baggies containing a total of 25.5 grams of crack cocaine were discovered concealed around Cromwell’s midsection.

    Then they did their job. Give these officers a raise and fire the judge for not wanting to keep the community safe.

    • MerchantsOfMisery
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      I like how instead of putting in even a little effort to understand why the charges were dropped, the bootlick is so strong in you that you somehow came to such a delusional conclusion.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        I know, you’re right.

        I was quick to comment and really didn’t give it much thought.

        It’s a character flaw that I’m working on.

        • AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          Hey, random internet commenter here. This is the way to positive character growth and I want to give you kudos. It’s hard to admit flaws but you owned up to it and took constructive feedback with grace. Keep it up :)

    • Cagi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Let’s get the cops to strip everyone naked at every traffic stop without any probable cause because that’s how good justice works? Our police need no reason to strip you naked? No.

      If the cops thought he had drugs on him, there is due process. But they tried to use the sound of plastic rustling as their probable cause, which is not a valid justification by a long way. This guy could be in prison for drug charges if these cops followed the laws in place to protect us. But because the cops cut corners and curtailed a man’s rights in the process, any evidence is unusable. This man’s freedom, despite being a drug dealing piece of shit, is 100% the cops fault, they know this is illegal but did it anyway. They set him free with their own incompetence.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      The search was illegal. No amount of whining by you or anyone else will change that fact.

    • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      If they had done their job the judge would not have thrown it out. Power tripping microdicks let this guy go by not following the legal process.

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The judge is doing his job. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (sect. 24) forbids the use of evidence obtained by violating a Charter right in court. The right violated in this case would be “security of the person” in sect. 7. The cops knew this, or should have—“fruit of the poisonous tree” isn’t exactly an obscure legal concept, and is something they need to understand to do their jobs, so I assume it’s taught in law enforcement courses. So the evidence being thrown out is 100% the cops’ fault.