• Arthur BesseA
    link
    32 years ago

    Aside from a tree view of subsidiary companies, this appears to just use a simple heuristic for extracting negative bits from wikipedia articles. I looked up a handful of interesting organizations and it basically just had their “controversy” and/or “scandals” sections of their wikipedia articles. Seems pretty useless; I think I’ll stick with en.wikipedia.org when i want to read wikipedia.