An upside-down flag, adopted by Trump supporters contesting the Biden victory, flew over the justice’s front lawn as the Supreme Court was considering an election case.

After the 2020 presidential election, as some Trump supporters falsely claimed that President Biden had stolen the office, many of them displayed a startling symbol outside their homes, on their cars and in online posts: an upside-down American flag.

One of the homes flying an inverted flag during that time was the residence of Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., in Alexandria, Va., according to photographs and interviews with neighbors.

The upside-down flag was aloft on Jan. 17, 2021, the images showed. President Donald J. Trump’s supporters, including some brandishing the same symbol, had rioted at the Capitol a little over a week before. Mr. Biden’s inauguration was three days away. Alarmed neighbors snapped photographs, some of which were recently obtained by The New York Times. Word of the flag filtered back to the court, people who worked there said in interviews.

“I had no involvement whatsoever in the flying of the flag,” Justice Alito said in an emailed statement to The Times. “It was briefly placed by Mrs. Alito in response to a neighbor’s use of objectionable and personally insulting language on yard signs.”

Judicial experts said in interviews that the flag was a clear violation of ethics rules, which seek to avoid even the appearance of bias, and could sow doubt about Justice Alito’s impartiality in cases related to the election and the Capitol riot.

Non-paywall link

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    145
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is why it’s so fucking insane Dems keep appointing “moderates” to the SC…

    Republicans are putting literal cult members, rapists, and insurrectionists on there.

    And the best we get is someone who will legitimately be non biased (except for rich people, both parties pick justices biased towards the wealthy).

  • 4grams@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Why is anyone even pretending to buy his bullshit. We all have seen the rulings, we’ve all heard his shouting, we’ve all witnessed his willingness to shred, delay, and deal for his party. so let’s drop this did he or didn’t he bullshit and figure out what the fuck to do about it.

    Edit- sorry for the rant, not targeted at anyone.

    Edit2- except alito

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The only thing even remotely surprising about that is that he threw his wife under the bus. And I’m only slightly surprised that he did that rather than just come out and admit it proudly.

  • BossDj@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’m remembering some FBI employees who were fired due to having “partisan” opinions about Trump

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      6 months ago

      Imagine thinking disliking a criminal rapist traitor is “partisan.”

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          Just in case it wasn’t clear, I was criticizing the traitors who did the firings, not you.

  • ganksy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    Zero surprise but the blatant dedication to fascism of the conservative justices scares the shit out of me.

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      “we” includes the Republican-controlled House of Representatives. I’d love to see it, but…

      • Phegan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Maybe I am incorrect, but you only need the Senate to confirm a new justice.

        Do you need the house to change the number of justices, I was under the impression you could do it with just the Senate and president

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artIII-S1-8-3/ALDE_00013559/

          In 1869, under a new presidential administration, Congress expanded the Court to include nine Justices.11 The 1869 legislation was the last time Congress changed the size of the Supreme Court.

          That was how we went up to nine justices. I assume “Congress” to mean both houses, otherwise they presumably would’ve said which house. But admittedly I haven’t dug into the logistics of that particular action

        • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The House of Representatives is only needed if there is a law on the books that says there can only be 9 Justices on the Supreme Court.

          If there is no law, then yeah. Only need the Senate to change the amount of justices.

          I would love it if there was a law about it as it would make it slightly harder for bad faith actors to expand the Court on the grounds of “The other side got to do it, so we get to do it too!” Aka Republicans.

          • Phegan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Nothing is stopping them from doing it if they take back power, they already have the court they want. We shouldn’t be so afraid to use the options afforded to us because we are afraid the otherside will follow in kind. We are on the verge of fascism and we should be doing everything we can to stop it.

  • MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yes, this, of all things, is the one thing sowing doubt in Justice Alito’s impartiality. Before this he’s been an absolute model of impartiality. No one has ever been more impartial.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    6 months ago

    Oh no! An impartial Justice! It’s a good thing we have CLEARLY ENFORCEABLE RULES against the Highest Court in the Land making Judgements not based on Law but based on Bias!

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      1-I think you’re confused what impartial means

      2-The rules of ethics are not enforceable. The justices are to self-manage and recuse themselves in such situations

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The justices are to self-manage and recuse themselves in such situations

        The real trouble is, this isn’t even just a “situation.” “Stop the steal” is based on a fundamental opposition to the rule of law, which is wholly incompatible with being a judge – let alone a Supreme Court Justice – at all.