BOOK REVIEW

Where should society draw the line on extreme wealth? A fresh account sets out the logic and suggests how to redress inequality.

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    As soon as you hit 1B net worth, you get a diploma that says “Congrats, you won capitalism”, and every penny headed for your accounts past that point gets diverted into a society welfare fund.

    Could probably set the bar A LOT lower too.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        20 to 50 millions ought to be more than enough. A billion is an amount that no longer makes any sense (assuming we’re in euros/dollars).

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’d also say that after you get out of the low tens of millions you are, by definition, a fucking asshole. You can’t get that much money except by exploiting others. In my mind a highly skilled individual could personally create 20 million in economic output.

          • lemmefixdat4u@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            Where does that put entertainers, professional athletes, and lottery jackpot winners? I hear that Taylor Swift is a billionaire solely through her music sales and performance income.

            • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              7 months ago

              Taylor Swift is an extremely odd case and might be one of the least ass-hole-y billionaires out there. But, given her level of wealth, why is she still charging for shows? Are all the people who work for her millionaires? Are all the roadies and stage hands and audio techs and venue greeters getting a fair portion of the revenue generated for their relative labor? Is there a compelling reason she shouldn’t’ve started giving away massive amounts of charity after she could afford her first mansion?

              My main point about all billionaires being assholes is that at a certain point the wealth is so worthless to you personally and so valuable to the people around you that hording it means you’re an asshole - you’re greedy enough that number-goes-up is more important than the well being of those around you and those that helped you accumulate your wealth.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      You could live a decent middle class lifestyle with 4 million dollars and never work again. Let’s be generous and say 10 million is the cap. There’s no reason to get further, much less to a billion.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      I love how when this gets recommended the responses turn into trying to find the more exact correct amount to set the line at. Just like normal politics though, they get bogged down so much that what seemed like a simple answer turns into discuss,defer,delay, and the original point was missed.