• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        With all due respect to her, which is none, Nancy Pelosi needs to go away and never speak to the public about anything again.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Not age caps, periodic mandatory cognitive function tests.

            Bernie is only slightly younger than Pelosi chronologically, but at least a couple decades sharper mentally. Trump is YOUNGER than Bernie but as senile as the day is long at the height of summer.

            Though most start to decline at or a few years after 70, some people can stay sharp long after and we need people like Bernie just as much as we don’t need people like Pelosi.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is just the latest example of why I lol so hard when some con whines about Nancy and claims she is some kind of radical leftist.

        After I catch my breath, I ask them exactly which policies make her “radical” and be as specific as possible. Not sure I’ve ever had an answer that involved anything coherent - maybe one of them has complained about her insider trading, but don’t seem to realize it’s not confined to her or even just Democrats.

        I find her exhausting for a lot of reasons, but they just have been told to hate her because she’s a women of some prominence who does not have their lips wrapped around the base of tiny d’s mushroom and the right wing haaaaaates that.

  • TheMusicalFruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The USA should not be sending any forms of “aid” to a country that has enough resources and wealth to build and maintain nuclear weapons.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Israel isn’t going to stop until they free the hostages and capture or (more likely kill) Yahya Sinwar.

      Civilian casualties are a by product of war. This war won’t end until the objectives have been accomplished.

      Would you prefer Israel use the most accurate munitions possible when fighting in an urban combat scenario or less accurate weapons. Less accurate weapons means more civilian casualties.

      Of course it would all be over if Hamas surrendered, odd how no one is calling for a group that committed actual genocide (rather than the internet meme version of “genocide” Israel is accused of) to surrender and face justice. If that happened the war would be over and there would be no more civilian casualties. But internet memes is more important than reality to a lot of people I guess.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Israel can stop the famine right now, just by letting aid in or civilians out. It’s not even about the 2,000 pound bombs anymore. That was abhorrent. This is systemic murder.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Look at a map. Egypt controls a border with Gaza. Egypt could allow refugees into Egypt, so why don’t they? Egypt is controlling the flow of aid into Gaza. Why isn’t Egypt allowing more aid in?

          But the goal isn’t to create hatred against Egypt is it? The goal isn’t to criticize the UN for incompetence either. The goal is to create hatred toward Israel, and all facts that don’t further this goal are ignored. Because it’s a propaganda campaign.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Israel isn’t going to stop

        Could have just finished your sentence there. They only care about the hostages for political optics and they know as well as anyone that you don’t stop terrorism just by killing the leaders. Their goal is to kill or displace as many Gazans as possible and then take over the area and the fossil gas on the coast. Everything else is just pretense.

        Civilian casualties are a by product of war.

        Israel are killing TWICE as many civilians as Hamas, though, by their own admission. They refuse to prove it though, so it’s probably much worse in reality. That’s not a by-product. That’s genocide.

        This war won’t end until the objectives have been accomplished.

        Unless the West stops them, you’re right about that, even as you’re completely wrong about what the actual objectives are.

        Of course it would all be over if Hamas surrendered,

        First of all it wouldn’t. Second of all, their radical ideology makes surrender impossible.

        the internet meme version of “genocide” Israel is accused of

        These are the actual criteria as per the genocide convention, for it to qualify as a genocide:

        any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such:

        • Killing members of the group; ✅️
        • Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; ✅️
        • Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; ✅️
        • Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; ✅️
        • Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. ❓️

        So as you see, it’s not a meme. By the official and only pertinent definition of genocide, the Israeli government IS committing genocide.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          They only care about the hostages for political optics and they know as well as anyone that you don’t stop terrorism just by killing the leaders.

          You could stop right there. You consider getting people out of a situation where they’re being raped and tortured to be about optics. That’s a real psychopath way of thinking about things.

          Only a psychopath would be so incapable of empathy that you could only consider this situation by considering from a mindset of only thinking about optics.

          Unless the West stops them, you’re right about that, even as you’re completely wrong about what the actual objectives are.

          And there’s the goal of this whole thing isn’t it? Hamas went into villages, brutally murdered men, women and children, to create a conflict. They took hostages to force a ground campaign which would cause a lot of civilian casualties. The goal? To turn the west against Israel.

          But it didn’t seem to work did it? You might want to crack open a history book, the Hamas strategy is a fascist strategy. A fascist strategy that involves killing Jews. People in the west have seen this before.

          Sure you got some young people to jump onboard. It’s sad how bad history education is now.

          But many people see Gaza and remember what German cities looked like after their country was run by psychopaths that killed Jews. Western countries aren’t going to intervene when Israel is doing the same things to destroy Hamas that we did to destroy the Nazis. It’s only young people that are ignorant of history that Hamas can influence.

          But young people tend not to vote and attention spans are very short. Civilian casualties are dropping in Gaza as Hamas is being diminished. How is it possible that civilian casualties are decreasing when there’s fewer Hamas strongmen to protect the Palestinian people from a genocidal army? Because Hamas lied to you about Israel committing genocide. Accuse the other side of the things you’re guilty of.

          If Taylor Swift tells her fans to vote for Biden it will be a bigger factor in the voting decisions of young people (who generally don’t vote) than all the propaganda that Hamas with the support of Iranian troll farms can put out. Older generations generally think the guys that are murdering Jews are the bad guys. Also those Iranian troll farms really don’t want Trump to win.

          All that Hamas has accomplished in terms of influencing the west is increasing the number of antisemitic attacks on synagogues and jewish businesses. Which doesn’t increase support for their cause in the west.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            You could stop right there

            I wish I’d taken your advice and stopped reading. The rest is just a garbage pile of strawmen, ad hominems and other bad faith arguments. Not a word of it was anything but spin, distortion and pure fabrication.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      8 months ago

      That might have been too subtle, I feel like a number of people are going to miss the joke there.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Though it makes me sad, you are probably right. Wayyyyy too many people levy this kind of thing at Sanders (and Chomsky, lol) as a supposedly serious charge.

        • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m completely with you, but I have to point out there are plenty antisemitic people of Jewish ancestry (Steve Pieczenick), and many other people who self hate their backgrounds (my father has said very derogatory things about American black people. He grew up in the islands, but still).

  • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The man who should have elected in 2016 AT THE LATEST.

    I’m going to go cry in a corner as Biden gets another country wrapped up in endless war so he can save democracy using… Zionism, guns, and drones.

    • spider@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The man who should have elected in 2016 AT THE LATEST.

      …and finishing his second term at roughly the same age as Biden starting his.

    • spider@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Bernie might not run for reelection at the end of his senate term later this year. I can’t blame him for wanting to get away from it all; he will be 83.

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I love Bernie, but that’s how you hand Trump a win. If you live in a swing state you’re unfortunately stuck voting for the lesser of two evils.

      • ReiRose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        I understand where you are coming from, and if you decide to do the ‘lesser of two evils approach’, I’m not mad at you. It’s a much better response than voting for the Dems because you believe they aren’t evil.

        I’m torn, because I quite obviously do not want any fascist-leaning-anyone to win, but I’m also horrified at the long term impact of a two-evil-party system. I’ve been paying closer and closer attention every four year cycle and the Manchin-Sinema block was the start of the end for me. The final nail was somewhere between finding out about Pelosi and her finances and the “we have power now, but vote for us next time and we will really do something about women’s bodily autonomy”.

        If I find an independent I agree with I’ll vote for them. If not I’ll write in Bernie. You may end up on the correct side of history as I stand weeping into a burning creator that was once a hopeful country.

        Added context: I’m blue County red state.

    • Saurok@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are socialist third party candidates already running. Claudia/Karina from PSL (Party for Socialism and Liberation) and Cornell West. I think it would make more sense to throw support behind one of them.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I agree. If you are in a decidedly red state that will already vote for a Republican. A socialist runner up would be hilarious.

          • joenforcer@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            There was an app for the 2016 election called #NeverTrump that tried to do exactly this by means of “vote trading”. Voters in swing states that wanted to vote 3rd party would get matched up with Californians willing to put in their “protest vote” in CA in exchange for voting Hillary in the swing state. Obviously it didn’t work, but this isn’t a new concept. The stakes are too high a third year in a row to fuck around.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Conservatives love a good genocide. They are falling over themselves in delight at the innocent families being slaughtered wholesale and are demanding even more weapons be sent.

    Conservatives will aggressively fight any bill that seeks to impede genocide. For that reason, I do not think this ammendment can pass.

    • stinky613@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, we could cut off every possible kind of funding to Israel and they’d still have sufficient military resources to level Gaza a hundred times over

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        So, we should just keep supplying more?

        I agree that we should take it further. Support, and demand, a cease fire now. There is a lot of inertia and this is a step in the right direction where a lot of other people are running in the wrong direction.

        • stinky613@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Personally I don’t think we should’ve been supplying them in the first place for the simple fact that they’re more than suitably equipped already

          I just think that if the goal is a ceasefire, neither continuing nor halting supplies would really move the needle. Want us to stop supplying them? Fine by me.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Agreed, but I do feel it’s important to do both. And this is a way to push against all that inertia of Israel being …. Well, Israel

  • Rolder@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    8 months ago

    In before we cut supplies and suddenly rockets start landing in Israeli civilian neighborhoods

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The Iron Dome doesn’t stop working the moment the US stops sending weapons to commit genocide with, dumbass.

      • Rolder@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        8 months ago

        The iron dome requires missiles to fire with, dumbass. Wouldn’t stop working right away sure, but one saturation attack and they’d be out.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You DO know that Israel is one of the richest countries in the world, richer than most European countries? And that they have enough missiles already to last them decades if not a fucking century?

          Of course you do. You’re just pretending you don’t to enforce the false narrative that Israel is the plucky underdog beset on all sides by enemies more powerful than them when in fact THEIRS is the most advanced and powerful military in the entire region by far. Most of which they use to murder Palestinian civilians.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Pretend the iron dome was gone. Terrorist indiscriminate rocket attacks against Israel would be like throwing a rock at a tank.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Maybe that will stop them from genociding Palestinians, because protecting them from the consequences of their actions clearly isn’t working.