Kate Starbird says attacks have made research difficult, and claims of bias arise because of prevalence of lies from the right

A key researcher in the fight against election misinformation – who herself became the subject of an intensive misinformation campaign – has said her field gets accused of “bias” precisely because it’s now mainly rightwingers who spread the worst lies.

Kate Starbird, co-founder of the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public, added that she feared that the entirely false story of rigged elections has now “sunk in” for many Americans on the right. “The idea that they’re already going to the polls with the belief that they’re being cheated means they’ll misinterpret everything they see through that lens,” she said.

Starbird’s group partnered with Stanford Internet Observatory on the Election Integrity Partnership ahead of the 2020 elections – a campaign during which a flood of misinformation swirled around the internet, with daily claims of unproven voter fraud.

Starbird and her team helped document that flood, and in return congressional Republicans and conservative attorneys attacked her research, alleging it amounted to censorship and violated the first amendment.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Its insane politicians are allowed to just spout bullshit. Its even more insane we’re wrestling with this mud snake instead of banishing it from our supposed enlightened institutions of man.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Starbird and her team helped document that flood, and in return congressional Republicans and conservative attorneys attacked her research, alleging it amounted to censorship and violated the first amendment.

    Jim Jordan, chair of the House judiciary committee, served as the ringleader of this effort in Congress, using his power to investigate groups and researchers that work to counter misinformation, particularly as it related to elections and Covid-19.

    A federal lawsuit from the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana alleges that the Biden administration violated the first amendment by colluding with social media companies to censor and suppress speech.

    The pressure campaign has chilled misinformation research just ahead of the pivotal 2024 presidential election, as some academics switch what they focus on and others figure out ways to better explain their work to a mixed audience.

    Her work was included in Jordan’s investigation, her emails were sought by the Louisiana and Missouri attorneys general, she was sued in another lawsuit brought by Stephen Miller’s America First Legal, and she and the center have been inundated by records requests.

    Widespread misinformation shared by rightwing politicians and activists since the 2020 election culminated in the January 6 insurrection, which was motivated by false claims of electoral fraud, almost all of which have been thrown out of court.


    The original article contains 1,197 words, the summary contains 214 words. Saved 82%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • freeindv@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    9 months ago

    The loss of trust in the election system is not the fault of anyone but the public health apparatus that was used to change all the election rules last minute for no good reason. Just like how all the fascism we were subjected to in the name of covid rightfully lost people’s faith in most public institutions

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Most reasonable people understood it was a reasonable response to a shitty circumstance.

      Ask Jewish people if they felt wearing masks and social distancing reminded them of the holocaust.

      • freeindv@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, it was not reasonable. It was not backed by science, so what was the real reason?

        It doesn’t matter what race you are, all normal people oppose medical fascism

          • freeindv@monyet.cc
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            9 months ago

            Not being able to go out in public. Censorship. Forced injection of drugs. Targeted forced shutdowns of businesses.

              • freeindv@monyet.cc
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                20
                ·
                9 months ago

                Did you hear about that lady who chose to have sex with he boss to keep her job? She has the audacity to cry rape and act like he forced her! We all know that NOBODY forced her to sleep with them and it was her choice

        • PLAVAT🧿S@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Agree, let’s stop all the medical fascism, women should have a right to choose what happens to their bodies, including abortion.

          And let’s agree these suggested laws preventing some folks (read: trans) from getting care are like actual death panels.

        • dtc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes the fucking fascist pricks won’t even let me chain-smoke while I pump my gas! And since when is it ILLEGAL to drink MY booze in MY car while I’m driving home from my court appointed ANGER MANAGEMENT classes? Insane! You sheeple are the worst.