• Omega_Haxors
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The best argument I heard that busts the whole narrative open is that you never hear about the famines that happened in the nearby areas. Turns out the one thing that gave Ukraine special attention over the other places is, lo and behold, that there were a fuck ton of nazis there.

    • vexikron@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Source?

      There were a ‘fuck ton’ of Nazis in Ukraine from 1931 to 1933?

      You are telling me Ukraine was full of Nazis during a time period nearly totally before the Enabling Act, while all the Nazis were streetfighting in Germany and devoting all their resources to taking over the German Societt and Government, that they sent fucktons of their membership over to the Soviet Union to… do unspecified things, and that Stalin and the Bolsheviks either did not notice this or were not displeased enough by this to not ally with Hitler to allow him to take France and the low countries and split up Poland less than a decade later?

      Stalin, who was famously in disbelief that Hitler reneged on his pact with him due to apparently actually trusting him to some degree, this same Stalin either did not notice or did not mind a fuck ton of Nazis causing a famine that killed millions in his country?

      ???

      And I mean source as in like any kind of historical documentation of this, or a comprehensive review of such evidence published in some way, not some zany idea some internet tankie made up as fanfiction for their alternate reality novel.