• SkyNTP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    No one else uses the term “cloud” like that.

    That part of this comic really stuck out like a sore thumb. I can’t tell if it’s an oversight, a comment about the challenges of self-hosting, or subtle mockery of self-hosting hypocrisy.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      No one else uses the term “cloud” like that

      Broadly, “the cloud” is just someone else’s computer. VPSes still fall into that definition. A lot of VPS providers describe themselves as “cloud” now too (eg one of the main hosts I use, HostHatch, describes themselves that way on their site).

      If a single AWS EC2 or Lightsail server (which is essentially just a VPS in one region) is considered to be “in the cloud”, why not a much cheaper, more powerful server with a different provider?

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        My interpretation of “cloud provided media storage” in the context of self-hosting is something like seaweedfs.