minus-square@fishinthecalculatorlink2•3 years agoAfter the parentheses revolution we’ll use S-exps all the way down! :D
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OPlink2•3 years agoBeen working with Clojure for the past decade, and I would loathe to use any language without s-exps at this point. :)
minus-square@fishinthecalculatorlink2•3 years ago+1, for me it was Guile Scheme. I think that S-exp are actually unbeatable for their combo of simplicity, expressive power and strong specification (and they are like ~60 years old). No one of the above mentioned formats has all of these features.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OPlink3•3 years agoYeah, I’m equal parts amused and depressed that CL and Scheme are much better languages that most of what’s come out since.
After the parentheses revolution we’ll use S-exps all the way down! :D
Been working with Clojure for the past decade, and I would loathe to use any language without s-exps at this point. :)
+1, for me it was Guile Scheme. I think that S-exp are actually unbeatable for their combo of simplicity, expressive power and strong specification (and they are like ~60 years old). No one of the above mentioned formats has all of these features.
Yeah, I’m equal parts amused and depressed that CL and Scheme are much better languages that most of what’s come out since.