• Count042
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Genocide is something that should be reductively absolute.

    Why do you think it shouldn’t be?

    If you support genocide, that should be something you are saddled with for the rest of your life.

      • Count042
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I’m 45.

        Supporting genocide is a good reductive test for if someone has any kind of morality. Same as with racism.

        The fact that you don’t recognize that, and think that not recognizing that makes you an adult that is not a cartoon says everything about your morality.

        It says nothing about my age or how many people I interact with.

        EDIT: You also didn’t answer the question on why you think Genocide shouldn’t be a reductive label.

        Do you think that genocide is ever justifiable?

        • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          You also didn’t answer the question on why you think Genocide shouldn’t be a reductive label.

          Seems like they’re avoiding answering direct questions about their beliefs or even fully explaining them. Why you might do that is anyone’s guess

          • Count042
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I have. And you know what? Genocide isn’t a matter of disagreeing. The fact that you think it is says everything anyone needs to know about you.