You can use kaspersky beta versions for free by downloading and installing it from their forum.

As a side note, after you install it you need to disable the debugging options once to get the optimal performance.

  • Asphalt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    But why would I need it?

    • LemmyQuest@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m mentioning this because I’ve noticed that Kaspersky is a common choice among many PC users I know. This might be useful information for those who are considering their options.

      Additionally, when searching for antivirus recommendations on platforms like Reddit, Lemmy, or YouTube, Kaspersky frequently appears as a highly regarded option.

    • retro@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      8 months ago

      Microsoft Defender is good and free, but it is heavier on system resources than any reputable AV. Kasperskey is near the top for least impact on system performance.

      • mindlight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Interesting. Do you have links that support your claims that I can read up on?

          • mindlight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            That chart doesn’t say anything about system resource usage.

            Edit: found the performance chart now. Still no explanation on what performance tests(more than two sentences) they performed and how the scoring was applied.

              • Telorand@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                8 months ago

                TBH, that still looks good for MS. It suffered a little with compressed archives (mediocre), installation was “fast,” and the rest were “very fast.” Certainly not as perfect as some, but unless you’re doing lots of installs and working with compressed files, I bet nobody would even notice this difference in real world use cases.

                • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The only place I notice Defender is on an old system (10 years) that’s had a billion changes - App installs/uninstalls, etc.

                  With a 4TB data drive, and a C drive that’s 90% full. Poor machine has been abused.

                  Don’t notice any issues on other machines, even when using 7zip on 100 gig archives.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Hahahaha

        You must be too young to remember the shit show Kaspersky had in the early 2000’s.

        I forget the details, but it was clear Kaspersky had become like Norton and the other formerly great names.