https://teddit.net/r/PrivacyGuides/comments/rxf02a/theanonymousjoker_false_privacy_prophet/
This is one of key GrapheneOS community members doing it, and r/PrivacyGuides has the same moderation team as r/privacytoolsio before, and the main moderator of r/privacy is also same.
Has anyone seen this kind of behaviour in overall privacy community?
Edit: https://ghostarchive.org/archive/ttkkU reddit post archived
deleted by creator
If you dislike a user, or dislike what he writes, you can simply block him from your account. Site bans are for people who violate the rules, and I dont think thats the case here. If it is, you should report the specific posts/comments which violate the rules.
comment chain because you delete comments
I have not been banned from r/Firefox, so you can stop lying.
Addressing the rest of your lies, all of those subreddits and groups promote closed source OSes for privacy and security, and are harmful to privacy seekers. They also have a thing in common – they let flourish vile proponents that trash Linux and FOSS projects daily.
The reason admins have not banned me here is because they recognise people like me and people like you. You lie and you stand for obnoxious, toxic statements and even lie here:
You are a liar. A pure person of hatred, it seems. Everybody knows I do not use phrases like that. And you used 5-7 sockpuppets to downvote my comment and upvote yours.
I do not think this much lies and false slander should be allowed in a community here that is otherwise non toxic and peaceful. Hence you may enjoy your ban, and any upcoming GrapheneOS sockpuppet brigading will be dealt with accordingly as well.
The admins may feel free to reverse the ban and discuss if needed. But this is insane levels of gaslighting, toxicity and hatred. Lemmy does not need it.
slander is by definition false and a lie
Someone can speak lies in general besides slandering someone. Therefore your statement does not look that clever here. Last I checked, lies and slander were not synonyms.
From https://lemmy.ml/post/140015/comment/105153
What about calling me one?
One what?